Talk:Natural language: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson (==Purpose of this article==) |
imported>John Stephenson (purpose - should be more to do with computation and artificial languages, otherwise it overlaps too much with language) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Purpose of this article== | ==Purpose of this article== | ||
It seems that a lot of this overlaps with other articles such as [[Linguistics]]. When I think of the phrase 'natural language', the links with computational linguistics and constructed/artificial languages come to mind. I think this should be emphasised; other passages could be moved elsewhere. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 04:34, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | It seems that a lot of this overlaps with other articles such as [[Linguistics]]. When I think of the phrase 'natural language', the links with computational linguistics and constructed/artificial languages come to mind. I think this should be emphasised; other passages could be moved elsewhere. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 04:34, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
:I still think this, for the record. :-) In my experience of linguistics, 'natural language' is only ever used in reference to computation and artificial language. I think this article should emphasise these two fields. The rest can go on [[language]] - rewritten so it's not from Wikipedia. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 19:44, 31 October 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 18:44, 31 October 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Linguistics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Pat Palmer 00:06, 14 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Purpose of this article
It seems that a lot of this overlaps with other articles such as Linguistics. When I think of the phrase 'natural language', the links with computational linguistics and constructed/artificial languages come to mind. I think this should be emphasised; other passages could be moved elsewhere. John Stephenson 04:34, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
- I still think this, for the record. :-) In my experience of linguistics, 'natural language' is only ever used in reference to computation and artificial language. I think this article should emphasise these two fields. The rest can go on language - rewritten so it's not from Wikipedia. John Stephenson 19:44, 31 October 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Linguistics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Linguistics Advanced Articles
- Linguistics Nonstub Articles
- Linguistics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Linguistics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Linguistics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Linguistics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Linguistics External Articles
- Linguistics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Linguistics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup