User talk:Thomas Mandel

Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitions • add metadata • edit new pages

Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!

-- Sarah Tuttle 18:16, 18 May 2007 (CDT)

Complementary

Moved this from DNA talk pageNancy Sculerati 03:52, 10 June 2007 (CDT)

You ask what I wish to see in the article. Well, is this true of DNA?

Jonas Salk The Anatomy of Reality

"It appears that all units of reality are comprised of two basic elements in an asymmetrical binary relationship in dynamic interaction..." (p.38) "As noted above, one of the basic ideas that underlies my thinking, one of the images I have in mind when I contemplate the universe, is that it is constructed upon a simple pattern of order that may be seen in any and all phenomena, no matter how complex. The simple pattern is that of a binary relationship, recognized in a binary system. The implication here is that everything in nature, everything in the universe, is composed of networks of two elements, or two parts in functional relationship to each other..."(p.39) "The most fundamental phenomenon in the universe is relationship."(p.44)

Consider that the entire store of DNA knowledge is derived from a pair of base pairs held together by a pair of pairs which is then read as a pair, transcribed as a pair and finally constructed as an amino acid as a pair i.e., as a pair one by one via an enzyme which is a pair.

Thomas Mandel 23:39, 9 June 2007 (CDT)

Thomas, we are looking -as a group- t make a great on-line enccyclopedia. When I pointed out that the article DNA has been nominated for approval, and suggested that this was not the appropriate time for a novice to try his hand at editing, but that putting down questions and explaining what you might like to know that is not there , I meant in a scholarly fashion, such that your aim would be to try to help make that article of higher quality. Your question is a philosophical one that I have moved here, we are in a more directed mode in that article. I again had to revert one of your edits, because the protein coat of pneumococcus is a major factor in enabling the bacteria to infect organisms. I git your e-mail about approval. An editor in a workgroup that your article falls into would have to approve it for nomination. At this time, it is a very broad article. Although it has many references, they are not tied in wuth the text. Even if you can't do numbered footnote references (I can't I admit) put them in parentheses and they can be formatted later. Put the workgroups that you think the article falls under in categories. Look at another article that has workgroups on its edit page to see how to write the code. Nancy Sculerati 03:52, 10 June 2007 (CDT)