Civil society: Difference between revisions
imported>Roger A. Lohmann (Major revision and expansion of entry) |
imported>Roger A. Lohmann (Some major additions) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
</ref> While Ferguson did not draw a line between the state and the society, [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], the 19th century German philosopher, made this distinction in his Elements of the Philosophy of Right.<ref> See [http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/pr/preface.htm G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy of Right Hegel, 1827 (translated by Dyde, 1897)]</ref>. Hegel used the term "bürgerliche Gesellschaft" . The German [[Zivilgesellschaft]] emphasizes a more inclusive community than the state. Hegel viewed civil society dialectically along with the state and the [[family]] or [[household]] (sometimes broadened today as the [[intimate sphere]]. This Hegelian trichotomy is echoed in contemporary calls for a [[Third Way]] as well as contemporary conceptions of the [[third sector]]. Subsequent interpretations of civil society by left- and right-Hegelians differed substantially. Karl Marx's critique of [[bourgeois society]] rendered the term a weapon in the Marxist critique of all non-state aspects of society, economy and polity. <ref> See Pelczynski, 1984</ref> (See also the discussion on [[State]] and Civil Society for more on this issue). On the other side, civil society joined with a neo-[[Tocquevillian]] view of voluntary associations became the basis of contemporary conceptions of a [[third sector]] between [[market]] and [[state]]. Geo-political events, including the decline of military dictatorships in Latin America and the collapse of the Soviet Empire in Europe are usually credited with a tremendous increase of interest in civil society in the 1990s. | </ref> While Ferguson did not draw a line between the state and the society, [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], the 19th century German philosopher, made this distinction in his Elements of the Philosophy of Right.<ref> See [http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/pr/preface.htm G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy of Right Hegel, 1827 (translated by Dyde, 1897)]</ref>. Hegel used the term "bürgerliche Gesellschaft" . The German [[Zivilgesellschaft]] emphasizes a more inclusive community than the state. Hegel viewed civil society dialectically along with the state and the [[family]] or [[household]] (sometimes broadened today as the [[intimate sphere]]. This Hegelian trichotomy is echoed in contemporary calls for a [[Third Way]] as well as contemporary conceptions of the [[third sector]]. Subsequent interpretations of civil society by left- and right-Hegelians differed substantially. Karl Marx's critique of [[bourgeois society]] rendered the term a weapon in the Marxist critique of all non-state aspects of society, economy and polity. <ref> See Pelczynski, 1984</ref> (See also the discussion on [[State]] and Civil Society for more on this issue). On the other side, civil society joined with a neo-[[Tocquevillian]] view of voluntary associations became the basis of contemporary conceptions of a [[third sector]] between [[market]] and [[state]]. Geo-political events, including the decline of military dictatorships in Latin America and the collapse of the Soviet Empire in Europe are usually credited with a tremendous increase of interest in civil society in the 1990s. | ||
== The Rise | == The Rise, Fall, Rise, Fall and Rise of Civil Society == | ||
Published work on civil society since the 18th century has been characterized by periods of great interest interspersed with periods of relatively little interest. The early years following publication of Ferguson's work (1767) were characterized by great interest | Published work on civil society since the 18th century has been characterized by several periods of great interest interspersed with periods of relatively little interest. Since the late 1980s there has been a worldwide upsurge of interest in the idea among researchers, theorists, governments, [[civil society organizations]] and many other avenues. Indeed, it requires a substantial network of related pages associated with this entry merely to introduce all of the basic concepts, ideas and activities now associated with this provocative notion. | ||
The early years following publication of Ferguson's work (1767) were characterized by great interest in Great Britain, continental Europe and the colonial Americas and new United States. There were, however, few memorable additions or extensions of Ferguson until Hegel (1827). Alexis de Tocqueville's ''Democracy in America'' (1845) is today widely cited in connection with civil society, despite no mention of civil society in that work. <ref> As one indicator of this, the indices of neither the 1945 Murray edition nor the more recent Mansfield translation contain any mention of the term </ref> is Tocqueville expanded considerably on numerous themes of civil society with no explicit reference to the concept itself or to Ferguson or Hegel. In Europe, as well, work by a host of scholars including [[Karl Marx]] (who largely rejected the idea of civil society independent of the state as part of his departure from Hegel), [[Max Weber]], [[Emile Durkheim]], [[Ferdinand Tönnies]] and a great many others. Nineteenth and early 20th century scholars did much to elaborate the concept of society as an autonomous sphere of activity, albeit with little explicit emphasis on the civil. (A great deal of work in historical sociology as well elaborates on these themes.) | |||
A major new departure arose in the emerging behavioral political science of the 1950s. Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba (1963) <ref> Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba. 1963. The civic culture; political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. (Updated in 1989 as Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba. 1989. The civic culture revisited. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications. | A major new departure arose in the emerging behavioral political science of the 1950s. Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba (1963) <ref> Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba. 1963. The civic culture; political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. (Updated in 1989 as Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba. 1989. The civic culture revisited. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications. | ||
Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
</ref> set forth the concept of [[civic culture]], measurable in terms of a cluster of related political and social attitudes in five democracies. As part of this work, Almond and Verba developed a major statement of the perspective of civic organizations as incubators of democracy and good citizenship. | </ref> set forth the concept of [[civic culture]], measurable in terms of a cluster of related political and social attitudes in five democracies. As part of this work, Almond and Verba developed a major statement of the perspective of civic organizations as incubators of democracy and good citizenship. | ||
Using then-new survey research techniques Almond and Verba employed a common modern interpretation of two | Using then-new survey research techniques Almond and Verba employed a common modern interpretation of two chapters in [[Alexis Tocqueville|Tocqueville]] <ref> Book 2, Part Two, Chapter 5, "On the Use Americans Make of Association in Civil Life", and Chapter 7, "Relations between Civil Associations and Political Associations"</ref>to argue that the political function of many community organizations is to foster better awareness and more informed citizens who will then make better voting choices and hold government more accountable [8]. They also drew a link between organizational bylaws and political constitutions of democratic governments, suggesting that these organizational micro-constitutions serve to socialize participants to the process of democratic decision making. (Both of these views are now routinely projected back upon Tocqueville by many authors.) | ||
Another line of writing about civil society arose within nascent [[conservative|conservatism]] in the U.S., as small government conservatives and antigovernment [[libertarian|libertarians]] sought alternatives to the growth of "big government" after World War II. In 1965,Richard Cournelle, | Another line of writing about civil society arose within nascent [[conservative|conservatism]] in the U.S., as small government conservatives and antigovernment [[libertarian|libertarians]] sought alternatives to the growth of "big government" after World War II. In 1965,Richard Cournelle, | ||
a corporate executive and independent scholar, published a call for protection and encouragement of a sector of civic space completely independent of government.<ref>Cornuelle, Richard C. 1965. Reclaiming the American dream. New York,: Random House.|Richard Cournelle</ref> The term, if not the underlying theory became the basis of a well known Washington DC organization [[http://www.independentsector.org INDEPENDENT SECTOR]]. | a corporate executive and independent scholar, published a call for protection and encouragement of a sector of civic space completely independent of government.<ref>Cornuelle, Richard C. 1965. Reclaiming the American dream. New York,: Random House.|Richard Cournelle</ref> The term, if not the underlying theory became the basis of a well known Washington DC organization [[http://www.independentsector.org INDEPENDENT SECTOR]]. | ||
The President of INDEPENDENT SECTOR, Brian O'Connell, brought together several emerging threads of the Tocquevillian view of civil society in a reader published in 1983.<ref>O'Connell, Brian. 1983. American's voluntary spirit: A book of readings. New York: Foundation Center. </ref> | == Civil Society and the Voluntary Sector == | ||
Meanwhile, there were remarkable and unprecedented changes in a variety of related civil society phenomena beginning in the 1960s. The number of nonprofit organizations, the number and size of foundations, the total assets of nonprofit total annual donations and several other key indicators all increased dramatically. Beginning in the 1980s, investigators in a variety of basic and applied social sciences and such diverse fields as accounting, began to investigate all of this. One of the first questions was what to call all of this and another was how to account for it. The President of INDEPENDENT SECTOR, Brian O'Connell, brought together several emerging threads of the Tocquevillian view of civil society in a reader published in 1983.<ref>O'Connell, Brian. 1983. American's voluntary spirit: A book of readings. New York: Foundation Center. </ref> O'Connell used the term [[voluntary sector]] as a summary notion, but very quickly usage coalesced around the term [[nonprofit sector]], which is still in widespread use in the U.S. two decades later. | |||
Meanwhile, almost at the exact time that the notion of a [[nonprofit sector]] was coming into wider use, larger geo-political forces both nationally in the U.S. and internationally were destabilizing (or broadening?) the consensus view represented by O'Connell and INDEPENDENT SECTOR. In 1976, the American Enterprise Institute had published ''To Empower People'' by Peter Berger, a sociologist and Richard John Neuhaus, a noted conservative author.<ref>Berger, Peter L. and Richard Neuhaus. 1977. To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute. </ref> Berger and Neuhaus popularized the neo-Tocquevillian notion of nonprofit and civil society organizations as [[social institutions]] whose function was to 'mediate' between citizens and government, or the political state. | |||
In the late 1980's there were the multiple beginnings of a new groundswell of interest in the concept of civil society. Some of these occurred independent of the [[nonprofit sector]] focus in fields like [[political science]], [[sociology]] and [[law]]. Much of this new interest was fueled by efforts to move beyond [[totalitarianism]] in the European states rendered newly independent in the breakup of the Soviet Union and the Soviet empire, and the transcendence of democracy over military dictatorships in Latin America. | |||
Two interdisciplinary research organizations, founded in the late 1980s, in which issues of civil society still hold a great deal of interest are the [[http://www.istr.org International Society for Third Sector Research (ISTR, pronounced eye-star)]] and the [[http://www.arnova.org Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA)]]. | |||
==Bowling Alone and Together == | |||
Since that time, several initiatives and developments brought civil society into the mainstreams of many social science disciplines. Harvard sociologist | |||
In 1992, political philosophers Jean Cohen and Andrew Arato produced a large volume entitled Civil Society grounded in a major reconsideration of Hegel and setting forth a conception of civil society built around voluntary associations, communications media and social movements. <ref>Cohen, Jean L. and Andrew Arato. 1992. Civil society and political theory. Studies in contemporary german social thought. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. </ref> | |||
Also beginning in the 1990s, a multi-national research effort spearheaded by Lester Salamon and the [http://www.jhu.edu/~ccss/ Center for Civil Society ] at Johns Hopkins, began a massive research effort in two dozen countries that has produced an unprecedented amount of comparative information on the size, scale, employment and other factors associated with [[civil society organizations]] around the world. | |||
In the new millennium, Robert Putnam <ref>Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster. | |||
</ref> used the metaphoric comparison of bowling leagues in his childhood in contrast to people bowling alone in spare minutes today to frame a large body of national data suggesting declines in civic engagement and participation over recent decades. | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 14:41, 1 August 2007
Civil society refers to the arena of uncoerced collective action around shared interests, purposes and values. In theory, its institutional forms are distinct from those of the state, family and market, though in practice, the boundaries between state, civil society, family and market are often complex, blurred and negotiated. Civil society commonly embraces a diversity of spaces, actors and institutional forms, varying in their degree of formality, autonomy and power. Civil societies are often populated by organisations such as tax-exempt public charities, foundations, development non-governmental organisations, community and grassroots organizations, women's organisations, faith-based organisations, professional associations, trade unions, self-help groups, social movements, business associations, coalitions and advocacy groups.[1]
Origin
The term originated with Adam Ferguson, an 18th century Scottish social philosopher usually identified as one of the Scottish moralists, a group which also included Adam Smith. Ferguson saw the development of a commercial state as a way to change the corrupt feudal order and strengthen the liberty of the individual.[2] While Ferguson did not draw a line between the state and the society, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, the 19th century German philosopher, made this distinction in his Elements of the Philosophy of Right.[3]. Hegel used the term "bürgerliche Gesellschaft" . The German Zivilgesellschaft emphasizes a more inclusive community than the state. Hegel viewed civil society dialectically along with the state and the family or household (sometimes broadened today as the intimate sphere. This Hegelian trichotomy is echoed in contemporary calls for a Third Way as well as contemporary conceptions of the third sector. Subsequent interpretations of civil society by left- and right-Hegelians differed substantially. Karl Marx's critique of bourgeois society rendered the term a weapon in the Marxist critique of all non-state aspects of society, economy and polity. [4] (See also the discussion on State and Civil Society for more on this issue). On the other side, civil society joined with a neo-Tocquevillian view of voluntary associations became the basis of contemporary conceptions of a third sector between market and state. Geo-political events, including the decline of military dictatorships in Latin America and the collapse of the Soviet Empire in Europe are usually credited with a tremendous increase of interest in civil society in the 1990s.
The Rise, Fall, Rise, Fall and Rise of Civil Society
Published work on civil society since the 18th century has been characterized by several periods of great interest interspersed with periods of relatively little interest. Since the late 1980s there has been a worldwide upsurge of interest in the idea among researchers, theorists, governments, civil society organizations and many other avenues. Indeed, it requires a substantial network of related pages associated with this entry merely to introduce all of the basic concepts, ideas and activities now associated with this provocative notion.
The early years following publication of Ferguson's work (1767) were characterized by great interest in Great Britain, continental Europe and the colonial Americas and new United States. There were, however, few memorable additions or extensions of Ferguson until Hegel (1827). Alexis de Tocqueville's Democracy in America (1845) is today widely cited in connection with civil society, despite no mention of civil society in that work. [5] is Tocqueville expanded considerably on numerous themes of civil society with no explicit reference to the concept itself or to Ferguson or Hegel. In Europe, as well, work by a host of scholars including Karl Marx (who largely rejected the idea of civil society independent of the state as part of his departure from Hegel), Max Weber, Emile Durkheim, Ferdinand Tönnies and a great many others. Nineteenth and early 20th century scholars did much to elaborate the concept of society as an autonomous sphere of activity, albeit with little explicit emphasis on the civil. (A great deal of work in historical sociology as well elaborates on these themes.)
A major new departure arose in the emerging behavioral political science of the 1950s. Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba (1963) [6] set forth the concept of civic culture, measurable in terms of a cluster of related political and social attitudes in five democracies. As part of this work, Almond and Verba developed a major statement of the perspective of civic organizations as incubators of democracy and good citizenship.
Using then-new survey research techniques Almond and Verba employed a common modern interpretation of two chapters in Tocqueville [7]to argue that the political function of many community organizations is to foster better awareness and more informed citizens who will then make better voting choices and hold government more accountable [8]. They also drew a link between organizational bylaws and political constitutions of democratic governments, suggesting that these organizational micro-constitutions serve to socialize participants to the process of democratic decision making. (Both of these views are now routinely projected back upon Tocqueville by many authors.)
Another line of writing about civil society arose within nascent conservatism in the U.S., as small government conservatives and antigovernment libertarians sought alternatives to the growth of "big government" after World War II. In 1965,Richard Cournelle, a corporate executive and independent scholar, published a call for protection and encouragement of a sector of civic space completely independent of government.[8] The term, if not the underlying theory became the basis of a well known Washington DC organization [INDEPENDENT SECTOR].
Civil Society and the Voluntary Sector
Meanwhile, there were remarkable and unprecedented changes in a variety of related civil society phenomena beginning in the 1960s. The number of nonprofit organizations, the number and size of foundations, the total assets of nonprofit total annual donations and several other key indicators all increased dramatically. Beginning in the 1980s, investigators in a variety of basic and applied social sciences and such diverse fields as accounting, began to investigate all of this. One of the first questions was what to call all of this and another was how to account for it. The President of INDEPENDENT SECTOR, Brian O'Connell, brought together several emerging threads of the Tocquevillian view of civil society in a reader published in 1983.[9] O'Connell used the term voluntary sector as a summary notion, but very quickly usage coalesced around the term nonprofit sector, which is still in widespread use in the U.S. two decades later.
Meanwhile, almost at the exact time that the notion of a nonprofit sector was coming into wider use, larger geo-political forces both nationally in the U.S. and internationally were destabilizing (or broadening?) the consensus view represented by O'Connell and INDEPENDENT SECTOR. In 1976, the American Enterprise Institute had published To Empower People by Peter Berger, a sociologist and Richard John Neuhaus, a noted conservative author.[10] Berger and Neuhaus popularized the neo-Tocquevillian notion of nonprofit and civil society organizations as social institutions whose function was to 'mediate' between citizens and government, or the political state.
In the late 1980's there were the multiple beginnings of a new groundswell of interest in the concept of civil society. Some of these occurred independent of the nonprofit sector focus in fields like political science, sociology and law. Much of this new interest was fueled by efforts to move beyond totalitarianism in the European states rendered newly independent in the breakup of the Soviet Union and the Soviet empire, and the transcendence of democracy over military dictatorships in Latin America.
Two interdisciplinary research organizations, founded in the late 1980s, in which issues of civil society still hold a great deal of interest are the [International Society for Third Sector Research (ISTR, pronounced eye-star)] and the [Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA)].
Bowling Alone and Together
Since that time, several initiatives and developments brought civil society into the mainstreams of many social science disciplines. Harvard sociologist
In 1992, political philosophers Jean Cohen and Andrew Arato produced a large volume entitled Civil Society grounded in a major reconsideration of Hegel and setting forth a conception of civil society built around voluntary associations, communications media and social movements. [11]
Also beginning in the 1990s, a multi-national research effort spearheaded by Lester Salamon and the Center for Civil Society at Johns Hopkins, began a massive research effort in two dozen countries that has produced an unprecedented amount of comparative information on the size, scale, employment and other factors associated with civil society organizations around the world.
In the new millennium, Robert Putnam [12] used the metaphoric comparison of bowling leagues in his childhood in contrast to people bowling alone in spare minutes today to frame a large body of national data suggesting declines in civic engagement and participation over recent decades.
References
- ↑ What is civil society?. Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics (2004-03-01). Retrieved on 2007-7-18.
- ↑ Adam Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society, 1767 One of the impacts of his work was to provide a distinction of modern civil society and the medieval sacred society of Christendom
- ↑ See G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy of Right Hegel, 1827 (translated by Dyde, 1897)
- ↑ See Pelczynski, 1984
- ↑ As one indicator of this, the indices of neither the 1945 Murray edition nor the more recent Mansfield translation contain any mention of the term
- ↑ Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba. 1963. The civic culture; political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. (Updated in 1989 as Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba. 1989. The civic culture revisited. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
- ↑ Book 2, Part Two, Chapter 5, "On the Use Americans Make of Association in Civil Life", and Chapter 7, "Relations between Civil Associations and Political Associations"
- ↑ Cornuelle, Richard C. 1965. Reclaiming the American dream. New York,: Random House.|Richard Cournelle
- ↑ O'Connell, Brian. 1983. American's voluntary spirit: A book of readings. New York: Foundation Center.
- ↑ Berger, Peter L. and Richard Neuhaus. 1977. To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.
- ↑ Cohen, Jean L. and Andrew Arato. 1992. Civil society and political theory. Studies in contemporary german social thought. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- ↑ Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.