Talk:Amateur radio/Catalogs/USA: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chris Day
No edit summary
 
imported>Chris Day
(sub-sub-subpage might be too deep?)
Line 1: Line 1:
How about using a link like [[Amateur radio/Tables/USA]]
==sub-sub-subpage==
 
How about using a link like [[Amateur radio/Tables/USA]]?


The advantage here is that it conforms to the current [[CZ:Subpage Pilot|subpage standards]] (that might change) Possibly we need a ''regulations'' subpage? Also, sub-subpages are OK, that is what is being done for Signed Articles (see [[Biology/Signed_Articles/Fundamental_Questions_in_Biology_—_A_2006_PLoS_Editorial_by_Simon_A._Levin|example here]])but a sub-sub-subpage might be a bit too deep. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 12:21, 2 August 2007 (CDT)
The advantage here is that it conforms to the current [[CZ:Subpage Pilot|subpage standards]] (that might change) Possibly we need a ''regulations'' subpage? Also, sub-subpages are OK, that is what is being done for Signed Articles (see [[Biology/Signed_Articles/Fundamental_Questions_in_Biology_—_A_2006_PLoS_Editorial_by_Simon_A._Levin|example here]])but a sub-sub-subpage might be a bit too deep. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 12:21, 2 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:22, 2 August 2007

sub-sub-subpage

How about using a link like Amateur radio/Tables/USA?

The advantage here is that it conforms to the current subpage standards (that might change) Possibly we need a regulations subpage? Also, sub-subpages are OK, that is what is being done for Signed Articles (see example here)but a sub-sub-subpage might be a bit too deep. Chris Day (talk) 12:21, 2 August 2007 (CDT)