Hydrogen-like atom: Difference between revisions
imported>Paul Wormer No edit summary |
imported>Paul Wormer |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* ''r'' is the distance of the electron from the nucleus. | * ''r'' is the distance of the electron from the nucleus. | ||
The Schrödinger equation is | |||
:<math> | :<math> | ||
\left[ - \frac{\hbar^2}{2\mu} \ | \left[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2 \mu} \nabla^2 + V(r) \right] \psi(\mathbf{r}) = E \psi(\mathbf{r}), | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
where μ is, approximately, the [[mass]] of the [[electron]]. More accurately, it is the [[reduced mass]] of the system consisting of the electron and the nucleus. | where <math>\hbar</math> is [[Planck's constant]] divided by 2π, and where μ is, approximately, the [[mass]] of the [[electron]]. More accurately, it is the [[reduced mass]] of the system consisting of the electron and the nucleus. Because the electron mass is about 1836 smaller than the mass of the lightest nucleus (the proton), the value of μ is very close to the mass of the electron ''m''<sub>e</sub> for all hydrogenic atoms. In the remaining of the article we will often make the approximation μ = ''m''<sub>e</sub>. Since ''m''<sub>e</sub> will appear explicitly in the formulas it will be easy to correct for this approximation if necessary. | ||
Because the electron mass is about 1836 smaller than the mass of the lightest nucleus (the proton), the value of μ is very close to the mass of the electron ''m''<sub>e</sub> for all hydrogenic atoms. In the remaining of the article we will often make the approximation | |||
μ = ''m''<sub>e</sub>. Since ''m''<sub>e</sub> will appear explicitly in the formulas it will be easy to correct for this approximation if necessary. | |||
In [[Solid harmonics#Derivation, relation to spherical harmonics|this article]] (in which ''l''<sup> 2 </sup> is defined without Planck's constant and imaginary unit ''i'') it is shown that | |||
the operator ∇² expressed in spherical polar coordinates, can be written as | |||
:<math> | |||
\hbar^2 \nabla^2 = \frac{\hbar^2}{r}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2} r - \frac{l^2}{r^2}. | |||
</math> | |||
The wave function is written as a product of functions in the spirit of the method of [[separation of variables]]: | |||
:<math>\psi(r, \theta, \phi) = R(r)\,Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)\,</math> | |||
where <math>Y_{lm}</math> are [[spherical harmonics]], which are eigenfunctions of ''l''<sup> 2</sup> with eigenvalues <math>\hbar^2 l(l+1)</math>. | |||
Making this substitution, we arrive at the following one-dimensional Schrödinger equation: | |||
:<math> | |||
- \frac{\hbar^2}{2\mu}\left[ \frac{1}{r} \frac{d^2}{d r^2} r R(r) - \frac{l(l+1)R(r)}{r^2}\right] + V(r)R(r) = E R(r), | |||
</math> | |||
=== Wave function and energy === | === Wave function and energy === | ||
In addition to ''l'' and ''m'', there arises a third integer ''n'' > 0 from the boundary conditions imposed on ''R(''r'')''. The expression for the normalized wave function is: | |||
:<math>\psi_{nlm} = R_{nl}(r)\, Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi).</math> | |||
Below it will be derived that | |||
:<math> R_{nl} (r) = \sqrt {{\left ( \frac{2 Z}{n a_{\mu}} \right ) }^3\frac{(n-l-1)!}{2n[(n+l)!]} } e^{- Z r / {n a_{\mu}}} \left ( \ | :<math> R_{nl} (r) = \sqrt {{\left ( \frac{2 Z}{n a_{\mu}} \right ) }^3\frac{(n-l-1)!}{2n[(n+l)!]} } e^{- Z r / {n a_{\mu}}} \left ( \tfrac{2 Z r}{n a_{\mu}} \right )^{l} L_{n-l-1}^{2l+1} \left ( \tfrac{2 Z r}{n a_{\mu}} \right ) </math> | ||
where: | where: | ||
Line 60: | Line 69: | ||
* <math>Y_{lm} (\theta,\phi)\,</math> function is a [[spherical harmonic]]. | * <math>Y_{lm} (\theta,\phi)\,</math> function is a [[spherical harmonic]]. | ||
=== | ===Derivation of radial function=== | ||
As we just saw, we must solve the one-dimensional eigenvalue equation, | |||
:<math> | :<math> | ||
\ | \left \{ - {\hbar^2 \over 2m_e r} {d^2\over dr^2}r +{\hbar^2 l(l+1)\over 2m_e r^2}+V(r) \right \} R(r)=ER(r), | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
where we approximated μ by ''m''<sub> ''e''</sub>. | |||
If the substitution <math>u(r)\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ rR(r)</math> is made into | |||
If | |||
:<math> | :<math> | ||
-{\hbar^2 \over 2m_e} \frac{1}{r} {d^2 \over dr^2}r\,R(r) + \left(V(r) + {\hbar^2l(l+1) \over 2m_e r^2}\right)\, R(r) = E\, R(r), | -{\hbar^2 \over 2m_e} \frac{1}{r} {d^2 \over dr^2}r\,R(r) + \left(V(r) + {\hbar^2l(l+1) \over 2m_e r^2}\right)\, R(r) = E\, R(r), | ||
Line 89: | Line 82: | ||
:<math>-{\hbar^2 \over 2m_e} {d^2 u(r) \over dr^2} + V_{\mathrm{eff}}(r) u(r) = E u(r)</math> | :<math>-{\hbar^2 \over 2m_e} {d^2 u(r) \over dr^2} + V_{\mathrm{eff}}(r) u(r) = E u(r)</math> | ||
which is | which is a Schrödinger equation for the function ''u(r)'' with an effective potential given by | ||
:<math>V_{\mathrm{eff}}(r) = V(r) + {\hbar^2l(l+1) \over 2m_e r^2},</math> | :<math>V_{\mathrm{eff}}(r) = V(r) + {\hbar^2l(l+1) \over 2m_e r^2},</math> | ||
Revision as of 08:07, 17 September 2007
In physics and chemistry, a hydrogen-like atom (or hydrogenic atom) is an atom with one electron. Except for the hydrogen atom itself (which is neutral) these atoms carry positive charge e(Z-1), where Z is the atomic number of the atom and e is the elementary charge. Because hydrogen-like atoms are two-particle systems with an interaction depending only on the distance between the two particles, their non-relativistic Schrödinger equation can be solved in analytic form. The solutions are one-electron functions and are referred to as hydrogen-like atomic orbitals. These orbitals differ from one another in one respect only: the nuclear charge eZ appears in the radial part of the wave function.
Hydrogen-like atoms per se do not play an important role in chemistry. The interest in these atoms is caused mainly by the fact that in quantum mechanics their Schrödinger equation can be solved as easily as for the hydrogen atom itself, because Z enters the problem in a trivial way.
Quantum numbers
Hydrogen-like atomic orbitals are eigenfunctions of a Hamiltonian (energy operator) with eigenvalues proportional to 1/n², where n is a positive integer. Further the obitals are usually chosen such that they are also eigenfunctions of the square of the one-electron angular momentum vector operator l ≡ (lx, ly, lz) and of lz. The operator l 2 ≡ lx2 + ly2 + lz2 has an eigenvalue proportional to l(l+1), where l is a non-negative integer. The operator lz has an eigenvalue proportional to an integer usually denoted by m.
Note that the energies of the hydrogen-like orbitals do not depend on the angular momentum quantum numbers l and m, but solely on the principal quantum number n. The degeneracy (maximum number of linearly independent eigenfunctions of same energy) of energy level n is equal to n2. This is the dimension of the irreducible representations of the symmetry group of hydrogen-like atoms, which is SO(4).
A hydrogen-like atomic orbital is uniquely identified by the values of the principal quantum number n, the angular momentum quantum number l, and the magnetic quantum number m. These quantum numbers are integers and we summarize their ranges:
To this must be added the two-valued spin quantum number ms = ±½ in application of the exclusion principle. This principle restricts the allowed values of the four quantum numbers in electron configurations of more-electron atoms: it is forbidden that two electrons have the same four quantum numbers.
Completeness of hydrogen-like orbitals
In quantum chemical calculations hydrogen-like atomic orbitals cannot serve as an expansion basis, because they are not complete. The non-square-integrable continuum (E > 0) states must be included to obtain a complete set, i.e., to span all of one-electron Hilbert space.[1]
Schrödinger equation
The atomic orbitals of hydrogen-like atoms are solutions of the time-independent Schrödinger equation in a potential given by Coulomb's law:
where
- ε0 is the permittivity of the vacuum,
- Z is the atomic number (charge of the nucleus in unit e),
- e is the elementary charge (charge of an electron),
- r is the distance of the electron from the nucleus.
The Schrödinger equation is
where is Planck's constant divided by 2π, and where μ is, approximately, the mass of the electron. More accurately, it is the reduced mass of the system consisting of the electron and the nucleus. Because the electron mass is about 1836 smaller than the mass of the lightest nucleus (the proton), the value of μ is very close to the mass of the electron me for all hydrogenic atoms. In the remaining of the article we will often make the approximation μ = me. Since me will appear explicitly in the formulas it will be easy to correct for this approximation if necessary.
In this article (in which l 2 is defined without Planck's constant and imaginary unit i) it is shown that the operator ∇² expressed in spherical polar coordinates, can be written as
The wave function is written as a product of functions in the spirit of the method of separation of variables:
where are spherical harmonics, which are eigenfunctions of l 2 with eigenvalues . Making this substitution, we arrive at the following one-dimensional Schrödinger equation:
Wave function and energy
In addition to l and m, there arises a third integer n > 0 from the boundary conditions imposed on R(r). The expression for the normalized wave function is:
Below it will be derived that
where:
- are the generalized Laguerre polynomials in the definition given here.
- Note that is approximately equal to (the Bohr radius). If the mass of the nucleus is infinite then and .
- . (Energy eigenvalues. As we pointed out above they depend only on n, not on l or m).
- function is a spherical harmonic.
Derivation of radial function
As we just saw, we must solve the one-dimensional eigenvalue equation,
where we approximated μ by m e. If the substitution is made into
the radial equation becomes
which is a Schrödinger equation for the function u(r) with an effective potential given by
where the radial coordinate r ranges from 0 to . The correction to the potential V(r) is called the centrifugal barrier term.
In order to simplify the Schrödinger equation, we introduce the following constants that define the atomic unit of energy and length, respectively,
- .
Substitute and into the radial Schrödinger equation given above. This gives an equation in which all natural constants are hidden,
Two classes of solutions of this equation exist: (i) W is negative, the corresponding eigenfunctions are square integrable and the values of W are quantized (discrete spectrum). (ii) W is non-negative. Every real non-negative value of W is physically allowed (continuous spectrum), the corresponding eigenfunctions are non-square integrable. In the remaining part of this article only class (i) solutions will be considered. The wavefunctions are known as bound states, in contrast to the class (ii) solutions that are known as scattering states.
For negative W the quantity is real and positive. The scaling of y, i.e., substitution of gives the Schrödinger equation:
For the inverse powers of x are negligible and a solution for large x is . The other solution, , is physically non-acceptable. For the inverse square power dominates and a solution for small x is xl+1. The other solution, x-l, is physically non-acceptable. Hence, to obtain a full range solution we substitute
The equation for fl(x) becomes,
Provided is a non-negative integer, say k, this equation has polynomial solutions written as
which are generalized Laguerre polynomials of order k. We will take the convention for generalized Laguerre polynomials of Abramowitz and Stegun.[2] Note that the Laguerre polynomials given in many quantum mechanical textbooks, for instance the book of Messiah,[3] are those of Abramowitz and Stegun multiplied by a factor (2l+1+k)! The definition given in this article coincides with the one of Abramowitz and Stegun.
The energy becomes
The principal quantum number n satisfies , or . Since , the total radial wavefunction is
with normalization constant
which belongs to the energy
In the computation of the normalization constant use was made of the integral [4]
References
- ↑ This was observed as early as 1929 by E. A. Hylleraas, Z. f. Physik vol. 48, p. 469 (1929). English translation in H. Hettema, Quantum Chemistry, Classic Scientific Papers, p. 81, World Scientific, Singapore (2000). Later it was pointed out again by H. Shull and P.-O. Löwdin, J. Chem. Phys. vol. 23, p. 1362 (1955).
- ↑ Milton Abramowitz and Irene A. Stegun, eds. (1965). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. New York: Dover. ISBN 0-486-61272-4.
- ↑ A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, vol. I, p. 78, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1967). Translation from the French by G.M. Temmer
- ↑ H. Margenau and G. M. Murphy, The Mathematics of Physics and Chemistry, Van Nostrand, 2nd edition (1956), p. 130. Note that convention of the Laguerre polynomial in this book differs from the present one. If we indicate the Laguerre in the definition of Margenau and Murphy with a bar on top, we have .