History (etymology): Difference between revisions
imported>Bruno L'Astorina (New page: {{WPimport}} The word '''history''' {{polytonic|ἵστωρ}} is ultimately from the Proto-Indo-European ''*wid-tor-'', from the [[Root (linguistics)|...) |
imported>Bruno L'Astorina No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The word '''[[history]]''' is ultimately from the [[Proto-Indo-European language|Proto-Indo-European]] ''*wid-tor-'', from the [[Root (linguistics)|root]] ''*weid-'', "to know, to see". This root is also present in the English word ''wit'', in latin words ''vision'' and ''video'', in the [[Sanskrit language|Sanskrit]] word ''[[veda]]'', and in the [[Slavic language|Slavic]] word ''videti'' and ''vedati'', as well as others (The asterisk before a word indicates that it is a hypothetical construction, not an attested form.) | |||
The | The [[Ancient Greek]] word '''''{{polytonic|ἱστορία}}''''', ''istoría'', means "knowledge acquired by investigation, inquiry". Is that sense that made use [[Aristotle]] in his ''{{polytonic|Περί Τά Ζωα Ιστορία}}'', ''Peri Ta Zoa Istória'' or, in latinized form, ''Historia Animalium''.<ref name="Ferrater-Mora">Ferrater-Mora, José. ''Diccionario de Filosofia''. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel, 1994. </ref> The term is derived from ''{{polytonic|ἵστωρ}}'', ''hístōr'' meaning ''wise man'', ''witness'', or ''judge''. We can see early attestations of {{polytonic|ἵστωρ}} in [[Homeric Hymns]], [[Heraclitus]], the [[Athens|Athenian]] [[ephebe]]s' oath, and in [[Boeotia|Boiotic]] inscriptions (in a legal sense, either "judge" or "witness," or similar). The spirant is problematic, and not present in cognate Greek ''eídomai'' ("to appear"). The form ''historeîn'', "to inquire", is an [[Ionic Greek|Ionic]] derivation, which spread first in [[Classical Greece]] and ultimately over all of [[Hellenistic civilization]]. | ||
Is still in the greek sense that [[Francis Bacon]] used the term in late XVI century, when he talk about "[[Natural History]]". For him, ''historia'' is "the knowledge of objects determining by space and time", that sort of knowledge provided by [[memory]] (while [[science]] was provided by [[reason]], and [[poetry]] was provided by [[fantasy]]). Though this, because these kowledge is many times described in a [[narrative]] or [[descritive]] form, the word "record of facts", specifically ordained in a chronological form.<ref name="Ferrater-Mora">Ferrater-Mora, José. ''Diccionario de Filosofia''. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel, 1994. </ref> | |||
The word entered the [[English language]] in [[1390]] with the meaning of "relation of incidents, story". In [[Middle English]], the meaning was "story" in general. The restriction to the meaning "record of past events", in the sense of [[Herodotus]], arises in the late [[15th century]]. In German, French, and indeed, most neolatinian and germanic languages, this distinction was never made, and the same word is used to mean both "history" and "story". The adjective ''historical'' is attested from [[1561]], and ''historic'' from [[1669]]. <ref name="Whitney">Whitney, W. D. ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=wrACAAAAIAAJ The Century dictionary; an encyclopedic lexicon of the English language]''. New York: The Century Co, 1889. </ref> | |||
''Historian'' in the sense of a "researcher of history", however, is attested from [[1531]], and in all [[european langages]], the substantive "history" is still used to mean "what happened with men" and "the scholar study of the happened" (the [[german langage]] have attempted to disguish between ''Histoire'' and ''Geschichte'', but it was failed). One adopted solution is write ''the study of history'' with capital letter, ''History''. Another used solution is reserve the word ''[[historiography]]'' for the last sense. <ref name="Ferrater-Mora">Ferrater-Mora, José. ''Diccionario de Filosofia''. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel, 1994. </ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[category:etymology]] | [[category:etymology]] |
Revision as of 16:40, 3 October 2007
The word history is ultimately from the Proto-Indo-European *wid-tor-, from the root *weid-, "to know, to see". This root is also present in the English word wit, in latin words vision and video, in the Sanskrit word veda, and in the Slavic word videti and vedati, as well as others (The asterisk before a word indicates that it is a hypothetical construction, not an attested form.)
The Ancient Greek word ἱστορία, istoría, means "knowledge acquired by investigation, inquiry". Is that sense that made use Aristotle in his Περί Τά Ζωα Ιστορία, Peri Ta Zoa Istória or, in latinized form, Historia Animalium.[1] The term is derived from ἵστωρ, hístōr meaning wise man, witness, or judge. We can see early attestations of ἵστωρ in Homeric Hymns, Heraclitus, the Athenian ephebes' oath, and in Boiotic inscriptions (in a legal sense, either "judge" or "witness," or similar). The spirant is problematic, and not present in cognate Greek eídomai ("to appear"). The form historeîn, "to inquire", is an Ionic derivation, which spread first in Classical Greece and ultimately over all of Hellenistic civilization.
Is still in the greek sense that Francis Bacon used the term in late XVI century, when he talk about "Natural History". For him, historia is "the knowledge of objects determining by space and time", that sort of knowledge provided by memory (while science was provided by reason, and poetry was provided by fantasy). Though this, because these kowledge is many times described in a narrative or descritive form, the word "record of facts", specifically ordained in a chronological form.[1]
The word entered the English language in 1390 with the meaning of "relation of incidents, story". In Middle English, the meaning was "story" in general. The restriction to the meaning "record of past events", in the sense of Herodotus, arises in the late 15th century. In German, French, and indeed, most neolatinian and germanic languages, this distinction was never made, and the same word is used to mean both "history" and "story". The adjective historical is attested from 1561, and historic from 1669. [2]
Historian in the sense of a "researcher of history", however, is attested from 1531, and in all european langages, the substantive "history" is still used to mean "what happened with men" and "the scholar study of the happened" (the german langage have attempted to disguish between Histoire and Geschichte, but it was failed). One adopted solution is write the study of history with capital letter, History. Another used solution is reserve the word historiography for the last sense. [1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Ferrater-Mora, José. Diccionario de Filosofia. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel, 1994.
- ↑ Whitney, W. D. The Century dictionary; an encyclopedic lexicon of the English language. New York: The Century Co, 1889.