CZ Talk:Core Articles/Social Sciences: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joshua M. Jensen
(response to John)
imported>Joshua M. Jensen
(noted that I changed ling. to stage 3)
Line 11: Line 11:


:Yeah, I added the language families using size as a criterion (i.e., number of languages in family), but I agree that a lot of them should go. Good call. I'm really glad that we've got a full list now! [[User:Joshua M. Jensen|Joshua M. Jensen]] 09:37, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
:Yeah, I added the language families using size as a criterion (i.e., number of languages in family), but I agree that a lot of them should go. Good call. I'm really glad that we've got a full list now! [[User:Joshua M. Jensen|Joshua M. Jensen]] 09:37, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
:By the way, I just changed Linguistics to Stage 3. There's no question in my mind that it meets the definition of "most or all". [[User:Joshua M. Jensen|Joshua M. Jensen]] 09:39, 27 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 08:39, 27 October 2007

Which to boot out? (Linguistics)

As you can see, as of 27th October there are 5 too many in the linguistics lists. Which should be rejected? I think that individual languages and language families are less important, unless for some reason they are notable. I propose removing:

What do you think? Individual languages that I added I did so because they are widely spoken (e.g. Bengali and Javanese). John Stephenson 08:16, 27 October 2007 (CDT)

Yeah, I added the language families using size as a criterion (i.e., number of languages in family), but I agree that a lot of them should go. Good call. I'm really glad that we've got a full list now! Joshua M. Jensen 09:37, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
By the way, I just changed Linguistics to Stage 3. There's no question in my mind that it meets the definition of "most or all". Joshua M. Jensen 09:39, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=CZ_Talk:Core_Articles/Social_Sciences&oldid=318541"