CZ Talk:Core Articles/Social Sciences: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson (Which to boot out?) |
imported>John Stephenson m (ling) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Which to boot out?== | ==Which to boot out? (Linguistics)== | ||
As you can see, as of 27th October there are 5 too many in the lists. Which should be rejected? I think that individual languages and language families are less important, unless for some reason they are notable. I propose removing: | As you can see, as of 27th October there are 5 too many in the linguistics lists. Which should be rejected? I think that individual languages and language families are less important, unless for some reason they are notable. I propose removing: | ||
*[[Austro-Asiatic languages]] (1) | *[[Austro-Asiatic languages]] (1) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*[[Trans-New Guinea languages]] (1) | *[[Trans-New Guinea languages]] (1) | ||
What do you think? Individual languages that I added I did so because they are widely spoken (e.g. Bengali and Javanese). [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 08: | What do you think? Individual languages that I added I did so because they are widely spoken (e.g. Bengali and Javanese). [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 08:16, 27 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:16, 27 October 2007
Which to boot out? (Linguistics)
As you can see, as of 27th October there are 5 too many in the linguistics lists. Which should be rejected? I think that individual languages and language families are less important, unless for some reason they are notable. I propose removing:
- Austro-Asiatic languages (1)
- Austronesian languages (1)
- Niger-Congo languages (1)
- Nilo-Saharan languages (1)
- Trans-New Guinea languages (1)
What do you think? Individual languages that I added I did so because they are widely spoken (e.g. Bengali and Javanese). John Stephenson 08:16, 27 October 2007 (CDT)