User talk:Milton Beychok: Difference between revisions
imported>Milton Beychok No edit summary |
imported>Milton Beychok No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="padding:1em; border:solid 2px black; background-color:#cedff2;">'''PLEASE use the above + tab to enter a <u>new</u> comment.''' That provides you a form in which to first enter a Subject and then enter the new comment. Please sign the comment with four tildes like this <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. That automatically signs it with your user name, the date and the time. The form automatically provides subject and enters them in the Table of Contents which will appear below after four comments are posted. The form also automatically posts new comments '''below any previous comments''' (which is where they belong).<br><br> | <div style="padding:1em; border:solid 2px black; background-color:#cedff2;">'''PLEASE use the above + tab to enter a <u>new</u> comment.''' That provides you a form in which to first enter a Subject and then enter the new comment. Please sign the comment with four tildes like this <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. That automatically signs it with your user name, the date and the time. The form automatically provides subject and enters them in the Table of Contents which will appear below after four comments are posted. The form also automatically posts new comments '''below any previous comments''' (which is where they belong).<br><br> | ||
The first responder to someone's new comment should enter the response just beneath the new comment (instead of using the above + tab) and indent the response by starting with a colon like this ''':'''. Any second responder, indent further by starting with two colons like this '''::''' and any third responder, start with three colons like this ''':::''' and so forth.''' If we don't follow these practices, the result is jumbled mess.'''</div><br> | The first responder to someone's new comment should enter the response just beneath the new comment (instead of using the above + tab) and indent the response by starting with a colon like this ''':'''. Any second responder, indent further by starting with two colons like this '''::''' and any third responder, start with three colons like this ''':::''' and so forth.''' If we don't follow these practices, the result is jumbled mess.'''</div> | ||
{{archive box|auto=long|box-width=15em}} | |||
{{Usertime-text|Milt}}{{Template:Utc|-8}}<br><br><br><br><br> | |||
== I just archived the last batch of postings == | == I just archived the last batch of postings == | ||
Revision as of 18:39, 12 January 2009
The first responder to someone's new comment should enter the response just beneath the new comment (instead of using the above + tab) and indent the response by starting with a colon like this :. Any second responder, indent further by starting with two colons like this :: and any third responder, start with three colons like this ::: and so forth. If we don't follow these practices, the result is jumbled mess.
Where Milt lives it is approximately: 14:16
I just archived the last batch of postings
That is why this page looks rather empty at this moment. Milton Beychok 07:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Ideal gas law
First, I hope you liked your birthday presents!
Second, you might be amused at how convenient Ideal Gas Law has been at the moment. It's something that I hadn't used recently enough to remember that I knew it. I have a friend who has asked me to rig a carbon dioxide generator for a closed hydroponic greenhouse, and, for weird logistical reasons, can't use either a carbon dioxide cylinder or a propane-driven generator. So, I'm looking at a possible Rube Goldberg contraption derived from a hot chocolate dispenser, which meters calcium carbonate powder into acid. I can do the stoichiometry to know how many moles I get, but now I have to figure out how to convert moles generated into ppm in a specific volume at constant temperature. People are looking at me strangely as I walk around muttering pV = nRT. Howard C. Berkowitz 18:05, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Milton, maybe you should move the approval date to later to give people a chance to read it. Feel free to change anything you want; after all I did that too. --Paul Wormer 17:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Paul, you are right. I will add a week to the date. Milton Beychok 17:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Raising inline TeX
Milton, I saw that you raised/lowered LaTeX, but see my comment here: http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2470.0.html --Paul Wormer 08:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC)