Talk:U.S. Department of Defense/Catalogs/Military leaders

How to interpret "military", and what about other periods?

I did not take "Military" in the sense of land forces only, so put in a number of naval officers.

Also, what about interwar or less-than-major-war periods? The commanders in Grenada and Panama, for example, still played important roles.

Howard C. Berkowitz 14:08, 1 July 2008 (CDT)

Right on navy. we should have the top 50? people, many of them in peacetime. The goal is to show what articles are needed. Richard Jensen 14:14, 1 July 2008 (CDT)

I gave into a bit of temptation and put in some distinctly bad general officers, such as Fredendall, although one could spend a week on bad Civil War generals. Including Fredendall is like raising warthogs so you can appreciate your roses better. Jesus Christ Himself Lee comes to mind, with an ego worthy of MacArthur but without the talent.

Flag officers only? I put in, for example, John Warden as a specific contributor to the Gulf War, and can think of several other influential colonels/captains. Howard C. Berkowitz 14:23, 1 July 2008 (CDT)

ny view is that theorists (like Mahan) should be handled separately. Some were civilians (Schelling, Kahn). Richard Jensen 15:50, 1 July 2008 (CDT)