Talk:The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>David Finn
 
Line 8: Line 8:


:This is a challenging book. I've found errors, but I also found things worth thinking about. I'd probably recommend reading it, but with a very careful eye. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 14:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
:This is a challenging book. I've found errors, but I also found things worth thinking about. I'd probably recommend reading it, but with a very careful eye. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 14:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
::Some time ago I watched a lecture given by the authors about the report and reaction to it - I am going to watch it again and see if there is anything I can add. [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 10:17, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:17, 25 September 2010

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A controversial 2007 foreign policy book by academics John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, outgrowth of an essay originally published in the London Review of Books. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Politics and Military [Please add or review categories]
 Subgroup category:  American politics since 1945
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Ron Rosenbaum 'review'

This review isn't - it is just a quaint story about one man's struggle to see a small error in the book put right. He got his wish, but is it worth reprinting here? David Finn 08:11, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm not adamant either way, but a criticism of the book has been there are many small errors. Rosenbaum is also an individual that has been substantially criticized himself, and, in my opinion, has a certain credibility when talking about accuracy.
This is a challenging book. I've found errors, but I also found things worth thinking about. I'd probably recommend reading it, but with a very careful eye. Howard C. Berkowitz 14:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Some time ago I watched a lecture given by the authors about the report and reaction to it - I am going to watch it again and see if there is anything I can add. David Finn 10:17, 25 September 2010 (UTC)