Virial theorem: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
(New page: {{subpages}} In mechanics, a '''virial''' of a stable system of ''n'' particles is a quantity proposed by Rudolf Clausius in 1870. The virial is defined by :<math> \tfrac{1}{2} \s...)
 
imported>Paul Wormer
Line 37: Line 37:


==Application==
==Application==
An interesting application arises when each particle experiences a potential ''V'' of the form
An interesting application arises when the  potential ''V'' is of the form
:<math>
:<math>
V = A r^k\quad\hbox{with}\quad r = (x^2+y^2+z^2)^{1/2},
V = \sum_{i=1}^n V(\mathbf{r}_i)\quad \hbox{with}\quad V(\mathbf{r}_i) = a_i r_i ^k\quad\hbox{and}\quad r_i = (x_i^2+y_i^2+z_i^2)^{1/2},
</math>
</math>
where ''A'' is some constant (independent of space and time).
where ''a''<sub>''i''</sub> is some constant (independent of space and time).


An example of such potential is given by [[Hooke's law]] with ''k'' = 2 and [[Coulomb's law]] with ''k'' = &minus;1.
An example of such potential is given by [[Hooke's law]] with ''k'' = 2 and [[Coulomb's law]] with ''k'' = &minus;1.
The force derived from a potential is
The force derived from a potential is
:<math>
:<math>
\mathbf{F} = -\boldsymbol{\nabla}V \equiv -\left( \frac{ \partial V}{\partial x},\; \frac{ \partial V}{\partial y},\; \frac{ \partial V}{\partial z}\right)
\mathbf{F}_i = -\boldsymbol{\nabla}_i V \equiv -\left( \frac{ \partial V}{\partial x_i},\; \frac{ \partial V}{\partial y_i},\; \frac{ \partial V}{\partial z_i}\right)
</math>
</math>
Consider
Consider
:<math>
:<math>
\frac{ \partial V}{\partial x} = a \frac{ \partial r^k}{\partial x} = a k r^{k-1} \frac{ \partial r}{\partial x}=
\frac{ \partial V}{\partial x_i} = a_i \frac{ \partial (r_i)^k}{\partial x_i} = a_i k (r_i)^{k-1} \frac{ \partial r_i}{\partial x_i}= a_i k (r_i)^{k-1} \frac{x_i}{r_i} = k \frac{x_i}{r_i^2} V(\mathbf{r}_i).
a k r^{k-1} (x/r) = k \frac{x}{r^2} V\quad \Longrightarrow \mathbf{F}\quad = - k V \frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^2}.
</math>
Hence
:<math>
  \mathbf{F}_i = - k V(\mathbf{r}_i) \frac{\mathbf{r}_i}{r_i^2}.
</math>
</math>
Then applying this for ''i'' = 1, &hellip; ''n'',
Then applying this for ''i'' = 1, &hellip; ''n'',
:<math>
:<math>
2\langle T \rangle = k \sum_{i=1}^n \left \langle V(\mathbf{r}_i) \cdot \frac{\mathbf{r}_i\cdot \mathbf{r}_i}{r_i^2}\right\rangle =
2\langle T \rangle = k \sum_{i=1}^n \left \langle V(\mathbf{r}_i) \cdot \frac{\mathbf{r}_i\cdot \mathbf{r}_i}{r_i^2}\right\rangle =
k\langle V\rangle \quad\hbox{with}\quad V = \sum_{i=1} V(\mathbf{r}_i).
k\langle V\rangle \quad\hbox{where}\quad V = \sum_{i=1}^n V(\mathbf{r}_i).
</math>
</math>
For instance, for a system of charged particles interacting through a Coulomb interaction:
For instance, for a system of charged particles interacting through a Coulomb interaction:
Line 62: Line 65:
2\langle T \rangle = - \langle V \rangle.
2\langle T \rangle = - \langle V \rangle.
</math>
</math>
==Quantum mechanics==
==Quantum mechanics==
The virial theorem holds also in quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanically the angular brackets do not indicate  a time-average, but an expectation value with respect to an exact stationary eigenstate of the Hamiltonian of the system. The theorem will be proved and applied to the special case of a potential that has a ''r''<sup>''k''</sup>-like dependence. Everywhere Planck's constant ℏ is taken to be one.
The virial theorem holds also in quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanically the angular brackets do not indicate  a time-average, but an expectation value with respect to an exact stationary eigenstate of the Hamiltonian of the system. The theorem will be proved and applied to the special case of a potential that has a ''r''<sup>''k''</sup>-like dependence. Everywhere Planck's constant ℏ is taken to be one.

Revision as of 08:43, 15 February 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In mechanics, a virial of a stable system of n particles is a quantity proposed by Rudolf Clausius in 1870. The virial is defined by

where Fi is the total force acting on the i th particle and ri is the position of the i th particle; the dot stands for an inner product between the two 3-vectors. Indicate long-time averages by angular brackets. The importance of the virial arises from the virial theorem, which connects the long-time average of the virial to the long-time average ⟨ T ⟩ of the total kinetic energy T of the n-particle system,

Proof of the virial theorem

Consider the quantity G defined by

The vector pi is the momentum of particle i. Differentiate G with respect to time:

Use Newtons's second law and the definition of kinetic energy:

and it follows that

Averaging over time gives:

If the system is stable, G(t) at time t = 0 and at time t = T is finite. Hence, if T goes to infinity, the quantity on the right hand side goes to zero. Alternatively, if the system is periodic with period T, G(T) = G(0) and the right hand side will also vanish. Whatever the cause, we assume that the time average of the time derivative of G is zero, and hence

which proves the virial theorem.

Application

An interesting application arises when the potential V is of the form

where ai is some constant (independent of space and time).

An example of such potential is given by Hooke's law with k = 2 and Coulomb's law with k = −1. The force derived from a potential is

Consider

Hence

Then applying this for i = 1, … n,

For instance, for a system of charged particles interacting through a Coulomb interaction:

Quantum mechanics

The virial theorem holds also in quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanically the angular brackets do not indicate a time-average, but an expectation value with respect to an exact stationary eigenstate of the Hamiltonian of the system. The theorem will be proved and applied to the special case of a potential that has a rk-like dependence. Everywhere Planck's constant ℏ is taken to be one.

Let us consider a n-particle Hamiltonian of the form

where mj is the mass of the j-th particle. The momentum operator is

Using the self-adjointness of H and the definition of a commutator one has for an arbitrary operator G,

In order to obtain the virial theorem, we consider

Use

Define

Use

and we find

The quantum mechanical virial theorem follows

where ⟨ … ⟩ stands for an expectation value with respect to the exact eigenfunction Ψ of H.

If V is of the form

it follows that

From this:

For instance, for a stable atom (consisting of charged particles with Coulomb interaction): k = −1, and hence 2⟨T ⟩ = −⟨V ⟩.