Schröder-Bernstein theorem: Difference between revisions
imported>Peter Schmitt (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (new) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
The '''Schröder-Bernstein theorem''' is a fundamental theorem of [[set theory]]. | |||
Essentially, it states that if two sets are such that each one has at least as many elements as the other | |||
then the two sets have equally many elements. | |||
Though this assertion may seem obvious it needs a proof, and it is crucial for the definition of [[cardinality]] to make sense. | |||
'''Remark:''' | |||
In analogy to this theorem the term [[Schröder-Bernstein property]] is used | |||
in other contexts to describe similar properties. | |||
== The Schröder-Bernstein theorem == | |||
'''Theorem.''' | |||
If for two sets ''A'' and ''B'' there are | |||
an injective function from ''A'' into ''B'' and an injective function from ''B'' into ''A'' | |||
then there is a bijective function from ''A'' onto ''B''. | |||
In terms of [[cardinal number]]s this is equivalent to: | |||
'''Corollary.''' | |||
If |''A''| ≤ |''B''| and |''B''| ≤ |''A''| then |''A''| = |''B''|. | |||
Here |''A''| and |''B''| denote the cardinal numbers corresponding to the sets ''A'' and ''B''. | |||
<br> | |||
The corollary shows that ≤ is a partial [[order relation|order]] for cardinal numbers. | |||
(The order is indeed a linear order, but this aspect is not touched by the theorem | |||
since the existence of injective functions between the two sets is assumed in its statement.) | |||
'''Remark.''' | |||
It is of theoretical interest that the proof of the theorem does not depend on the [[Axiom of Choice]]. | |||
== Proof == | |||
The bijective function between the two sets can be explicitly constructed from the two injective functions given. | |||
Therefore the Axiom of Choice is not needed in the proof. | |||
(There are many versions of the proof.) | |||
=== Outline === | |||
The proof is based on a simple observation: | |||
<br> | |||
If ''A'' is the disjoint union of two sets, ''A''<sub>1</sub> and ''A''<sub>2</sub>, and ''B'' the disjoint union of two sets, ''B''<sub>1</sub> and ''B''<sub>2</sub>, | |||
such that ''B''<sub>1</sub> is the image of ''A''<sub>1</sub> under ''f'' and ''A''<sub>2</sub> is the image of ''B''<sub>2</sub> under ''g'' | |||
then a bijection from ''A'' onto ''B'' is obtained by taking ''f'' on ''A''<sub>1</sub> and ''g''<sup>−1</sup> on ''A''<sub>2</sub>. | |||
Such a dissection is characterized by the property that the following process, | |||
if performed on ''A''<sub>1</sub>, gives ''A''<sub>1</sub> as a result. (Thus ''A''<sub>1</sub> is a ''fixed point''.) | |||
: Take a subset of ''A'', find its image under ''f'' in ''B'', take the complement, find its image under ''g'' in ''A'', and, finally, take the complement. | |||
This defines a mapping of subsets of ''A'' to subsets of ''A'' that is monotone, and such a mapping always has a fixed point. | |||
=== Proof === | |||
By assumption, there are injective functions | |||
: <math> f : A \to B \quad\text{and}\quad g : B \to A </math> | |||
that induce two (injective) image mappings between the power sets | |||
: <math> f_\ast : \mathcal P(A) \to \mathcal P(B) \quad\text{and}\quad | |||
g_\ast : \mathcal P(B) \to \mathcal P(A) </math> | |||
The mapping | |||
: <math> | |||
\sigma (S) := A \setminus g_\ast ( B \setminus f_\ast (S) ) \quad ( S \subset A ) | |||
</math> | |||
on the power set of ''A'' is monotone | |||
: <math> S_1 \subset S \subset A | |||
\Rightarrow f_\ast (S_1) \subset f_\ast (S) | |||
</math> | |||
and | |||
: <math> A_1 := \bigcap \{ \sigma(S) \mid \sigma(S) \subset S \subset A \} | |||
</math> | |||
is a fixed point of σ | |||
: <math> \sigma (A_1) = A_1 </math> | |||
Thus the function ''h'' defined as | |||
: <math> h (a) := \begin{cases} f(a) & a \in A_1 \\ | |||
g^{-1}(a) & a \in A \setminus A_1 \\ \end{cases} | |||
</math> | |||
is a bijective function between ''A'' and ''B''. | |||
=== Details === | |||
(1) The induced image mappings are | |||
: <math> f_\ast (S) := \{ f(s) | s \in S \} \quad ( S \subset A ) | |||
\quad\text{and}\quad | |||
g_\ast (T) := \{ g(t) | t \in T \} \quad ( T \subset B ) | |||
</math> | |||
(2) σ is monotone: | |||
: <math> | |||
S_1 \subset S | |||
\Rightarrow f_\ast (S_1) \subset f_\ast (S) | |||
\Rightarrow B \setminus f_\ast (S_1) \supset B \setminus f_\ast (S) | |||
</math> | |||
:: <math> | |||
\Rightarrow g_\ast ( B \setminus f_\ast (S_1) ) \supset g_\ast ( B \setminus f_\ast (S) ) | |||
</math> | |||
:: <math> | |||
\Rightarrow | |||
\sigma (S_1) := A \setminus ( g_\ast ( B \setminus f_\ast (S_1) ) ) | |||
\subset A \setminus ( g_\ast ( B \setminus f_\ast (S) ) ) =: \sigma (S) | |||
</math> | |||
(3) ''A''<sub>1</sub> is a fixed point: | |||
: <math> \sigma(A) \in \mathcal A := \{ \sigma(S) \mid \sigma(S) \subset S \subset A \} | |||
\Rightarrow \mathcal A \not= \emptyset | |||
</math> | |||
: <math> (\forall \sigma(S) \in \mathcal A ) A_1 \subset \sigma(S) \subset S | |||
\Rightarrow \sigma (A_1) \subset \sigma^2 (S) \subset \sigma(S) \in \mathcal A | |||
</math> | |||
:: <math> | |||
\Rightarrow \sigma (A_1) \subset \bigcap \mathcal A = A_1 | |||
\Rightarrow \sigma(A_1) \in \mathcal A | |||
\Rightarrow \sigma (A_1) \supset \bigcap \mathcal A = A_1 | |||
</math> | |||
: <math> | |||
\Rightarrow \sigma (A_1) = A_1 | |||
</math> |
Revision as of 17:31, 24 September 2010
The Schröder-Bernstein theorem is a fundamental theorem of set theory. Essentially, it states that if two sets are such that each one has at least as many elements as the other then the two sets have equally many elements. Though this assertion may seem obvious it needs a proof, and it is crucial for the definition of cardinality to make sense.
Remark: In analogy to this theorem the term Schröder-Bernstein property is used in other contexts to describe similar properties.
The Schröder-Bernstein theorem
Theorem. If for two sets A and B there are an injective function from A into B and an injective function from B into A then there is a bijective function from A onto B.
In terms of cardinal numbers this is equivalent to:
Corollary. If |A| ≤ |B| and |B| ≤ |A| then |A| = |B|.
Here |A| and |B| denote the cardinal numbers corresponding to the sets A and B.
The corollary shows that ≤ is a partial order for cardinal numbers.
(The order is indeed a linear order, but this aspect is not touched by the theorem
since the existence of injective functions between the two sets is assumed in its statement.)
Remark. It is of theoretical interest that the proof of the theorem does not depend on the Axiom of Choice.
Proof
The bijective function between the two sets can be explicitly constructed from the two injective functions given. Therefore the Axiom of Choice is not needed in the proof. (There are many versions of the proof.)
Outline
The proof is based on a simple observation:
If A is the disjoint union of two sets, A1 and A2, and B the disjoint union of two sets, B1 and B2,
such that B1 is the image of A1 under f and A2 is the image of B2 under g
then a bijection from A onto B is obtained by taking f on A1 and g−1 on A2.
Such a dissection is characterized by the property that the following process, if performed on A1, gives A1 as a result. (Thus A1 is a fixed point.)
- Take a subset of A, find its image under f in B, take the complement, find its image under g in A, and, finally, take the complement.
This defines a mapping of subsets of A to subsets of A that is monotone, and such a mapping always has a fixed point.
Proof
By assumption, there are injective functions
that induce two (injective) image mappings between the power sets
The mapping
on the power set of A is monotone
and
is a fixed point of σ
Thus the function h defined as
is a bijective function between A and B.
Details
(1) The induced image mappings are
(2) σ is monotone:
(3) A1 is a fixed point: