CZ:Featured article/Current: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park (→Evidence-based medicine: Vacuum distillation) |
imported>Chunbum Park (→Vacuum distillation: Standard argument against free will) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== '''[[ | == '''[[Standard argument against free will]]''' == | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[ | The '''standard argument against free will''' is an argument that there exists a conflict between the possibility of [[free will]] and the postulates of [[determinism]] and [[indeterminism]]. A number of authors use this terminology.<ref name=Hobbs/><ref name=Doyle/> | ||
'' | A formal statement of the 'standard argument' can be phrased as follows:<ref name=BDoyle/><ref name=JMFischer/> | ||
:1. The concept of determinism contradicts that of free will. | |||
:2. The concept of indeterminism also contradicts free will. | |||
:3. Some occurrences are governed by determinism, and all the rest by indeterminism. | |||
''[[ | all of which lead to the conclusion: | ||
:4. Free will does not govern any occurrences (does not exist). | |||
The first two premises sometimes are referred to as the "deterministic" and "indeterministic" horns of the [[dilemma of determinism]],<ref name=FischerDoyle/> the conflict between the intuition of personal autonomy and the intuition that the world proceeds in a manner independent of human concerns. | |||
''[[Standard argument against free will|.... (read more)]]'' | |||
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;" | {| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! style="text-align: center;" | [[ | ! style="text-align: center;" | [[Standard argument against free will#References|notes]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 21:55, 21 December 2013
Standard argument against free will
The standard argument against free will is an argument that there exists a conflict between the possibility of free will and the postulates of determinism and indeterminism. A number of authors use this terminology.[1][2]
A formal statement of the 'standard argument' can be phrased as follows:[3][4]
- 1. The concept of determinism contradicts that of free will.
- 2. The concept of indeterminism also contradicts free will.
- 3. Some occurrences are governed by determinism, and all the rest by indeterminism.
all of which lead to the conclusion:
- 4. Free will does not govern any occurrences (does not exist).
The first two premises sometimes are referred to as the "deterministic" and "indeterministic" horns of the dilemma of determinism,[5] the conflict between the intuition of personal autonomy and the intuition that the world proceeds in a manner independent of human concerns.
notes |
---|
|