Talk:Eurozone crisis/Catalogs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
imported>Ro Thorpe No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Thank you for your interest. I had intended to italicise them all in line of my (inconsistent) practice of italicising words that are intended to be interpreted as titles of something - and not as they might otherwise be interpreted. Should I abandon that practice? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 11:44, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | : Thank you for your interest. I had intended to italicise them all in line of my (inconsistent) practice of italicising words that are intended to be interpreted as titles of something - and not as they might otherwise be interpreted. Should I abandon that practice? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 11:44, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
::And thanks for your prompt reply! I think you should, yes: it's not normal practice. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 15:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:54, 21 November 2011
Why are some of the political parties italicised? Ro Thorpe 11:28, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your interest. I had intended to italicise them all in line of my (inconsistent) practice of italicising words that are intended to be interpreted as titles of something - and not as they might otherwise be interpreted. Should I abandon that practice? Nick Gardner 11:44, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- And thanks for your prompt reply! I think you should, yes: it's not normal practice. Ro Thorpe 15:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)