Integral Fast Reactor: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Choice of Fuel and Coolant: clarify need for tight fit of fuel in the cladding)
Line 4: Line 4:
== Choice of Fuel and Coolant ==
== Choice of Fuel and Coolant ==
The IFR has a unique design for its fuel rods, which allows larger burnup of the fuel, and provides inherent safety if the rod ever gets too hot. The fuel slug is loose in the cladding, and there is space above the fuel to contain gaseous fission products released as the fuel is consumed. See Figure 1. In standard fuel rods, the cladding must be tight around the ceramic fuel pellets to ensure adequate thermal conductivity and avoid overheating the fuel. This limits the lifetime of the rods, because the fuel swells and the cladding cracks as the gaseous fission products accumulate.
The IFR has a unique design for its fuel rods, which allows larger burnup of the fuel, and provides inherent safety if the rod ever gets too hot. The fuel slug is loose in the cladding, and there is space above the fuel to contain gaseous fission products released as the fuel is consumed. See Figure 1. In standard fuel rods, the cladding must be tight around the ceramic fuel pellets to ensure adequate thermal conductivity and avoid overheating the fuel. This limits the lifetime of the rods, because the fuel swells and the cladding cracks as the gaseous fission products accumulate.
The loose fit in the IFR rods is possible, because the gap is filled with highly conductive liquid sodium. Pure metallic fuel can be used, instead of oxides, because the sodium doesn't corrode the fuel or the cladding. If the fuel gets too hot, it melts and expands into the gas plenum shutting down the fission reaction.
The loose fit in the IFR rods is possible, because the gap is filled with highly conductive liquid sodium. Pure metallic fuel can be used, instead of oxides, because the sodium doesn't corrode the fuel or the cladding. If the fuel gets too hot, it melts and expands into the gas plenum, shutting down the fission reaction.


== Safety ==
== Safety ==

Revision as of 12:12, 21 March 2023

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Debate Guide [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The Integral Fast Reactor is Argonne Lab's best design, a metal-fueled, sodium-cooled, Fast Neutron Reactor, addressing all the issues raised in Nuclear_power_reconsidered (safety, waste management, weapons proliferation, and cost).

Fig.1 Fuel rod with high burnup and inherent safety.[1]

Choice of Fuel and Coolant

The IFR has a unique design for its fuel rods, which allows larger burnup of the fuel, and provides inherent safety if the rod ever gets too hot. The fuel slug is loose in the cladding, and there is space above the fuel to contain gaseous fission products released as the fuel is consumed. See Figure 1. In standard fuel rods, the cladding must be tight around the ceramic fuel pellets to ensure adequate thermal conductivity and avoid overheating the fuel. This limits the lifetime of the rods, because the fuel swells and the cladding cracks as the gaseous fission products accumulate. The loose fit in the IFR rods is possible, because the gap is filled with highly conductive liquid sodium. Pure metallic fuel can be used, instead of oxides, because the sodium doesn't corrode the fuel or the cladding. If the fuel gets too hot, it melts and expands into the gas plenum, shutting down the fission reaction.

Safety

Waste Management

Fuel rods have an advantage over molten salt fuels in that the fission products are contained in the rod. A typical 500 MWe MSR produces 13 tonnes of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) per year. A 500 MWe PWR produces ___ kg per year of SNF. A 500 MWe IFR produces ___ kg per year of (High Level Waste) HLW. Note: SNF can be reprocessed, and the final amount of HLW will depend on the details of that process.

Weapons Proliferation

Cost

Notes and References

  1. Fig.6.1 in PLENTIFUL ENERGY The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, CHARLES E. TILL and YOON IL CHANG, 2011.