Integral Fast Reactor: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(add paragraph on proliferation risk)
(clarify safety tests)
Line 10: Line 10:
== Safety ==
== Safety ==
The safety of the IFR design is ensured by several features:<br>
The safety of the IFR design is ensured by several features:<br>
1) The metal fuel, a low melting point alloy of U-Pu-Zr, will melt if the rod ever gets too hot. The fuel then expands upward in the steel cladding, shutting down the fission reactions. See Fig.1.<br>
1) The metal fuel, a low melting point alloy of U-Pu-Zr, will melt if the rod ever gets too hot. The fuel then expands upward in the steel cladding, shutting down the fission reactions (see Figure 1). The IFR is "walk away safe".<br>
2) Many of the fission products bind chemically with sodium, reducing the risk of fission product release if there is fuel failure.<br>
2) Many of the fission products bind chemically with sodium, reducing the risk of fission product release if there is fuel failure.<br>
3) The large pool of molten sodium will easily handle the decay heat after a shut-down. See Fig.2.<br>
3) Convection in the large pool of molten sodium will easily handle the decay heat after a shut-down (see Figure 2).<br>
4) The reactor vessel has no penetrations below the top of the pool, eliminating the possibility of sodium leakage.<br>
4) The reactor vessel has no penetrations below the top of the pool, eliminating the possibility of sodium leakage.<br>
5) There is no high pressure or any water near the reactor vessel.<br>
5) There is no high pressure or any water near the reactor vessel.<br>
6) The entire reactor chamber can be flooded with Argon, eliminating the possibility of a sodium fire.<br>
6) The entire reactor chamber can be flooded with Argon, eliminating the possibility of a sodium fire.<br>
Tests were conducted at Idaho National Laboratory in which the primary coolant pump was stopped with the reactor running at full power. The reactor shut itself down with no damage.<ref name=IFRtests/>
Tests were conducted at Idaho National Laboratory in which the primary coolant pump was stopped with the reactor running at full power. All safety systems were disabled, and the control rods were held fully withdrawn. The reactor shut itself down with no damage.<ref name=IFRtests/>


== Waste Management ==
== Waste Management ==

Revision as of 09:49, 16 April 2023

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Debate Guide [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The Integral Fast Reactor is Argonne Lab's best design,[1] a metal-fueled, sodium-cooled, pool-type Fast Neutron Reactor, addressing all the issues raised in Nuclear_power_reconsidered (safety, waste management, weapons proliferation, and cost). "Integral" refers to the on-site reprocessing of the spent fuel.

Fig.1 Fuel rod with high burnup and inherent safety.[2]
Fig.2 Pool-type reactors have enormous heat capacity, and molten sodium will expand when hot, allowing convection to cool the core if the pump ever fails.

Choice of Fuel and Coolant

The IFR has a unique design for its fuel rods, which allows larger burnup of the fuel, and provides inherent safety if the rod ever gets too hot. The fuel slug is loose in the cladding, and there is space above the fuel to contain gaseous fission products released as the fuel is consumed. See Figure 1. In standard fuel rods, the cladding must be tight around the ceramic fuel pellets to ensure adequate thermal conductivity and avoid overheating the fuel. This limits the lifetime of the rods, because the fuel swells and the cladding cracks as the gaseous fission products accumulate. The loose fit in the IFR rods is possible, because the gap is filled with highly conductive liquid sodium. Pure metallic fuel can be used, instead of oxides, because the sodium doesn't corrode the fuel or the steel cladding. If the metal fuel gets too hot, it melts and expands into the gas plenum, shutting down the fission reaction.

Safety

The safety of the IFR design is ensured by several features:
1) The metal fuel, a low melting point alloy of U-Pu-Zr, will melt if the rod ever gets too hot. The fuel then expands upward in the steel cladding, shutting down the fission reactions (see Figure 1). The IFR is "walk away safe".
2) Many of the fission products bind chemically with sodium, reducing the risk of fission product release if there is fuel failure.
3) Convection in the large pool of molten sodium will easily handle the decay heat after a shut-down (see Figure 2).
4) The reactor vessel has no penetrations below the top of the pool, eliminating the possibility of sodium leakage.
5) There is no high pressure or any water near the reactor vessel.
6) The entire reactor chamber can be flooded with Argon, eliminating the possibility of a sodium fire.
Tests were conducted at Idaho National Laboratory in which the primary coolant pump was stopped with the reactor running at full power. All safety systems were disabled, and the control rods were held fully withdrawn. The reactor shut itself down with no damage.[3]

Waste Management

Fuel rods have an advantage over molten salt fuels in that the fission products are contained in the rod. This means a smaller volume of radioactive spent fuel. Also rods are easy to identify and count, which may be advantageous in preventing diversion. A typical 500 MWe MSR produces 13 tonnes of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) per year. A 500 MWe PWR produces ___ kg per year of SNF. A 500 MWe IFR produces ___ kg per year of (High Level Waste) HLW. Note: SNF can be reprocessed, and the final amount of HLW will depend on the details of that process.

Weapons Proliferation

The chemistry of the IFR fuel process does not allow extraction of weapons-grade material at any point in the cycle. Spent fuel is a mix of uranium, plutonium, and various actinides. Processing would be necessary by some other unrelated process, a situation not different in kind from starting with unprocessed fuel. So the IFR adds little or nothing to proliferation risk.[4] In countries not licensed for fuel processing, return of the spent fuel to a secure location could be handled as any other reactor with solid fuel rods. Rods are easy to count, and the number in transit at any one time can be small enough to avoid theft of a large quantity.

Cost

Notes and References

  1. PLENTIFUL ENERGY The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011.
  2. Schematic of the metal fuel rod. Fig.6.1 in PLENTIFUL ENERGY The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011.
  3. Experimental Confirmations of Limited Damage in the Most Severe Accidents, Ch.7.10 in PLENTIFUL ENERGY The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011.
  4. Nonproliferation Aspects of the IFR, Ch.12 in PLENTIFUL ENERGY The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011.