CZ:Anthropology Workgroup: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick No edit summary |
imported>Joe Quick No edit summary |
||
Line 264: | Line 264: | ||
**[[Darkness in El Dorado Controversy]] | **[[Darkness in El Dorado Controversy]] | ||
**[[Human subjects research]] | **[[Human subjects research]] | ||
**[[Indigenous rights]] | |||
***[[Native American Graves Repatriation Act]] | |||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 09:18, 14 September 2007
Workgroups are no longer used for group communications, but they still are used to group articles into fields of interest. Each article is assigned to 1-3 Workgroups via the article's Metadata. |
| ||||||||
Anthropology article | All articles (340) | To Approve (0) | Editors: active (0) / inactive (6) and Authors: active (178) / inactive (0) |
Workgroup Discussion | ||||
Recent changes | Citable Articles (3) | |||||||
Subgroups (1) |
Checklist-generated categories:
Subpage categories:
|
Missing subpage categories:
Article statuses:
|
Priority List |
Welcome to the Anthropology workgroup on CZ - we are working on priority topics and have compiled the list below and are trying to work through them one by one. One of the most critical tasks - I feel - is to complete some of the major headings, as the subpages are then logically identified and can thus be listed. Please feel free to go in and edit away, add to the list etc. It would also be helpful if some editors would look at completing or moving towards approval some of the articles I have started (there would be a clear COI if I did this). Also, you will note in the list below that I have marked in bold and italics many of the articles. The reason I have done this is that I believe that these are either High Priority "stem" articles, or they are articles that I believe people will search for frequently, or type in when begining a search on a topic. Please add to this as you see fit. I would like to ask that these be formally recognized as High Priority topics by this workgroup and anyone who can work on editing and moving towards approval, begin one of these with a stub if it doesn't exist, or better yet if you feel capable of building a developed article please do so! Many thanks in advance!
Lee R. Berger 04:37, 8 September 2007 (CDT) |