Talk:History of scientific method: Difference between revisions
imported>David Tribe No edit summary |
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Im doing this to guide authors where specific content is needed. Look out for adding content especially relevant to biology. [[History of biology]] is empty and it would be good to create totally CZ content there. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 16:05, 26 January 2007 (CST) | Im doing this to guide authors where specific content is needed. Look out for adding content especially relevant to biology. [[History of biology]] is empty and it would be good to create totally CZ content there. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 16:05, 26 January 2007 (CST) | ||
? How influential was Pierce? Popper claimed not to have read him, so I wonder whether his work had as much impact as is suggested? | |||
Hobbes I guess needs mention. What about the role of the church? The church both promoted scientific advance while at the same time constraining it - I think the rebellion against religious dogma was an important stage in the evolution of scientific method, and echoes from Galileo to Darwin and TH Huxley. What about prehistoric science - the astronomical calculations involved in prehistoric constructions imply a very sophisticated systems of observation, recording and inductive reasoning from these. Just some thoughts.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 17:46, 26 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 17:46, 26 January 2007
This topic provides a target for a link from Biology and History of biology .. David Tribe 15:47, 26 January 2007 (CST)
- We can tell that with "What Links Here." ^^; Shanya Almafeta 16:00, 26 January 2007 (CST)
Im doing this to guide authors where specific content is needed. Look out for adding content especially relevant to biology. History of biology is empty and it would be good to create totally CZ content there. David Tribe 16:05, 26 January 2007 (CST)
? How influential was Pierce? Popper claimed not to have read him, so I wonder whether his work had as much impact as is suggested?
Hobbes I guess needs mention. What about the role of the church? The church both promoted scientific advance while at the same time constraining it - I think the rebellion against religious dogma was an important stage in the evolution of scientific method, and echoes from Galileo to Darwin and TH Huxley. What about prehistoric science - the astronomical calculations involved in prehistoric constructions imply a very sophisticated systems of observation, recording and inductive reasoning from these. Just some thoughts.Gareth Leng 17:46, 26 January 2007 (CST)