Talk:Nicene Creed: Difference between revisions
imported>Thomas Simmons (Response to L. Sanger) |
imported>Thomas Simmons (Response to L. Sanger) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Non-editors cannot nominate articles for approval. See [[CZ:Approval Process]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:16, 14 March 2007 (CDT) | Non-editors cannot nominate articles for approval. See [[CZ:Approval Process]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:16, 14 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
:I have gotten the roles of author and editor reversed. Larry Sanger has pointed out that as an author, I can not nominate this for approval. I would appreciate it if an editor would take a look at this and help establish approved status. Thomas Simmons 16:40, 16 March 2007 (EPT) | |||
Shouldn't this live at [[Nicene Creed]]? I don't usually take Google searches as indicative of ''very'' much, but "Nicaene Creed" gets a total of 44 hits, while "Nicene Creed" gets 524,000. The other spelling seems ''extremely'' rare, even in credible sources. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:01, 14 March 2007 (CDT) | Shouldn't this live at [[Nicene Creed]]? I don't usually take Google searches as indicative of ''very'' much, but "Nicaene Creed" gets a total of 44 hits, while "Nicene Creed" gets 524,000. The other spelling seems ''extremely'' rare, even in credible sources. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:01, 14 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
Both I guess. The church documents and literature I consult for this uses the Nicaene spelling. If it is commonly spelled th other way, the two spellings should be referred to given that a number of sources will index 'Nicaene' but not 'Nicene'. How should this be entered in the opening? [[User:Thomas Simmons|Thomas Simmons]] 16:24 16 March 2007 (EPT) | Both I guess. The church documents and literature I consult for this uses the Nicaene spelling. If it is commonly spelled th other way, the two spellings should be referred to given that a number of sources will index 'Nicaene' but not 'Nicene'. How should this be entered in the opening? [[User:Thomas Simmons|Thomas Simmons]] 16:24 16 March 2007 (EPT) | ||
Revision as of 21:45, 15 March 2007
Here is the basic article on the Nicaene Creed. It was written from scratch using accessible and credible sources. Thomas Simmons 15:08 14 March 2007 (EPT)
Non-editors cannot nominate articles for approval. See CZ:Approval Process. --Larry Sanger 00:16, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
- I have gotten the roles of author and editor reversed. Larry Sanger has pointed out that as an author, I can not nominate this for approval. I would appreciate it if an editor would take a look at this and help establish approved status. Thomas Simmons 16:40, 16 March 2007 (EPT)
Shouldn't this live at Nicene Creed? I don't usually take Google searches as indicative of very much, but "Nicaene Creed" gets a total of 44 hits, while "Nicene Creed" gets 524,000. The other spelling seems extremely rare, even in credible sources. --Larry Sanger 20:01, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
Both I guess. The church documents and literature I consult for this uses the Nicaene spelling. If it is commonly spelled th other way, the two spellings should be referred to given that a number of sources will index 'Nicaene' but not 'Nicene'. How should this be entered in the opening? Thomas Simmons 16:24 16 March 2007 (EPT)