Talk:Dialect: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer
(Dialect continuum has its own article and need not be defined so extensively here)
imported>John Stephenson
(duplication of information?)
Line 18: Line 18:
==Dialect continuum, duplication of information?==
==Dialect continuum, duplication of information?==
Since there is a separate [[Dialect_continuum]] page which is extensive, would it be possible to shorten the section here, which seems to define what a continuum is?  It seems to me that there may be considerable duplication of effort here.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 15:12, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
Since there is a separate [[Dialect_continuum]] page which is extensive, would it be possible to shorten the section here, which seems to define what a continuum is?  It seems to me that there may be considerable duplication of effort here.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 15:12, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
:Done; just a couple of examples now. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 23:07, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 22:07, 8 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Dialect"
Workgroup category or categories Linguistics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by John Stephenson 04:59, 4 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





changed status

I revised cleanup status to No since there are many non-existent links; my understanding is that these should be linked or eliminated as part of cleanup. If that's correct, then there's more cleanup to do here.Pat Palmer 16:43, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

I've changed the status to '4' as this is basically a WP article with little change. John Stephenson 04:59, 4 April 2007 (CDT)


Dialect continuum, duplication of information?

Since there is a separate Dialect_continuum page which is extensive, would it be possible to shorten the section here, which seems to define what a continuum is? It seems to me that there may be considerable duplication of effort here.Pat Palmer 15:12, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

Done; just a couple of examples now. John Stephenson 23:07, 8 April 2007 (CDT)