Talk:Education: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Bill MacKenty (what should the education page look like?) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Forgive me if I'm stepping into an area I shouldn't be...I'm hoping to contribute in the area of educational technology. I would be happy to post a framework for the education page, which we can then edit as necessary. Thought? [[User:Bill MacKenty|Bill MacKenty]] 07:59, 29 March 2007 (CDT) | Forgive me if I'm stepping into an area I shouldn't be...I'm hoping to contribute in the area of educational technology. I would be happy to post a framework for the education page, which we can then edit as necessary. Thought? [[User:Bill MacKenty|Bill MacKenty]] 07:59, 29 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
Hi Bill, | |||
Have at it! I'll be very interested, since I have a special interest in educational theory. I deleted the short notice you put on [[Education]], simply because I think we should make a practice of not placing anything on a page unless we write at least 50, and preferably 100, words on the topic itself. If we turn a red link blue, people should expect to find substantial information on the page. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:27, 29 March 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 01:27, 29 March 2007
Forgive me if I'm stepping into an area I shouldn't be...I'm hoping to contribute in the area of educational technology. I would be happy to post a framework for the education page, which we can then edit as necessary. Thought? Bill MacKenty 07:59, 29 March 2007 (CDT)
Hi Bill,
Have at it! I'll be very interested, since I have a special interest in educational theory. I deleted the short notice you put on Education, simply because I think we should make a practice of not placing anything on a page unless we write at least 50, and preferably 100, words on the topic itself. If we turn a red link blue, people should expect to find substantial information on the page. --Larry Sanger 08:27, 29 March 2007 (CDT)