Talk:Slavery: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen (past tense is ok) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
== Implied past tense of slavery as a phenomenon == | == Implied past tense of slavery as a phenomenon == |
Revision as of 16:38, 14 November 2007
Implied past tense of slavery as a phenomenon
No doubt it's unintentional, but the language of this article seems to reinforce subtly the idea that slavery is primarily a phenomenon of the past, rather than something that is occurring in various forms even in the present, and even in many countries where it has been formally banned (including the USA). This could (should?) be mentioned even in the very introduction of the article, and might even create a little spark to encourage further reading.
So glad to see this article appearing. This is a serious topic, and deserves attention. Thanks for getting it going!
Richard J. Senghas 17:17, 1 June 2007 (CDT)
- I think the past tense is appropriate. Richard Jensen 17:36, 1 June 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Sociology Developing Articles
- Sociology Nonstub Articles
- Sociology Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Anthropology Developing Articles
- Anthropology Nonstub Articles
- Anthropology Internal Articles
- Sociology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Anthropology Underlinked Articles
- History tag