Talk:Barack Obama/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
imported>Warren Schudy No edit summary |
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:''Obama, a charismatic speaker,[1] repeatedly '''criticized''' Clinton for her 2002 vote supporting war against Iraq, and for her '''alleged''' ties to lobbies and old-fashioned politics.'' | :''Obama, a charismatic speaker,[1] repeatedly '''criticized''' Clinton for her 2002 vote supporting war against Iraq, and for her '''alleged''' ties to lobbies and old-fashioned politics.'' | ||
[[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 23:47, 10 January 2008 (CST) | [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 23:47, 10 January 2008 (CST) | ||
::I don't have any problem with the new text of Richard, as it seems clear that Clinton is part of the old way of doing politics in the USA. What I do have a problem with, is that Richard removed the improvements made to other parts of the text by Stephen. Please reinsert them, Richard, because they are needed. [[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 23:56, 10 January 2008 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 23:56, 10 January 2008
This is an attempt to write an article on this candidate, Barack Obama. It attempts to be a biography, not a day to day account of his campaign, nor a campaign advertisement. Disclosure: I am a US citizen. I am not registered to either party as a voter. Larry Yount 21:58, 26 July 2007 (CDT)
Steve has complained (privately) that Richard reverted his edits without explanation. I agree that that is simply unacceptable, particularly in light of recent discussions. Well, as a very imperfect stopgap measure, here's what I've decided: Steve, feel free to redo your edits, if you want. Then, Richard may not touch them; others will have to do so, if they are flawed. If he does edit them, then tell me, and I will ban him from working on this article. --Larry Sanger 21:34, 10 January 2008 (CST)
- Steve was the one who changed my edits. with, as you can see, no explanation on the talk page.Richard Jensen 21:48, 10 January 2008 (CST)
The facts are here:
- http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Barack_Obama&diff=100246909&oldid=100246908
- http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Barack_Obama&diff=100246910&oldid=100246909
- http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Barack_Obama&diff=100248705&oldid=100246914
On what Larry stated I could do, what I'm choosing is, "sometimes the polite way is to let the other person undo his or her own work, once a mistake is pointed out."
Stephen Ewen 22:22, 10 January 2008 (CST)
How about:
- Obama, a charismatic speaker,[1] repeatedly criticized Clinton for her 2002 vote supporting war against Iraq, and for her alleged ties to lobbies and old-fashioned politics.
Warren Schudy 23:47, 10 January 2008 (CST)
- I don't have any problem with the new text of Richard, as it seems clear that Clinton is part of the old way of doing politics in the USA. What I do have a problem with, is that Richard removed the improvements made to other parts of the text by Stephen. Please reinsert them, Richard, because they are needed. Martin Baldwin-Edwards 23:56, 10 January 2008 (CST)