CZ Talk:Technical Team: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephen Ewen m (CZ Talk:Technical Team Workgroup moved to CZ Talk:Technical Team: To avoid debate about usage of "Workgroup". The same purpose will be accomplished regardless of name.) |
imported>Stephen Ewen (Whatever we call it, it'll still do the same thing!) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Hmmm. The thesaurus is [http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/workgroup pretty useless] on this one. But I guess it would be over ''technical'' content, like the pages for [[CZ:Templates]], [[CZ:Extensions]], and that sort of thing. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 15:26, 27 December 2007 (CST) | Hmmm. The thesaurus is [http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/workgroup pretty useless] on this one. But I guess it would be over ''technical'' content, like the pages for [[CZ:Templates]], [[CZ:Extensions]], and that sort of thing. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 15:26, 27 December 2007 (CST) | ||
:But how about we just avoid this debate and just be content with "Technical Team". Whatever we call it, it'll still do the same thing! [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 16:09, 27 December 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 16:09, 27 December 2007
My idea for this was much more narrowly tailored. But what do you have in mind, RWK? Stephen Ewen 18:21, 24 December 2007 (CST)
- Um, I just copied the bio workgroup page for a template (because I don't think we have a generic workgroup template page!), and I'm modifying it greatly.
- Oh, gosh, looks great now. :-) Stephen Ewen 21:03, 24 December 2007 (CST)
- Do I detect sarcasm. =\. --Robert W King 21:12, 24 December 2007 (CST)
- Oh, gosh, looks great now. :-) Stephen Ewen 21:03, 24 December 2007 (CST)
- No, its much better. Stephen Ewen 15:41, 26 December 2007 (CST)
Well, it's either going to be "Technical Workgroup" or "Technical Team" (the name you gave it is redundant) and if you're interested in participating in such a team, by golly, you should communicate with the actual team: send mail to bugs@citizendium.org.
I wouldn't call it a "workgroup." It wouldn't be responsible for content, so it's not anything like the existing workgroups. --Larry Sanger 13:52, 27 December 2007 (CST)
- Well, whatever it will be called, it at least has a face! In the current state (as Stephen said somewhere) you basically have to be "in the know". --Robert W King 13:57, 27 December 2007 (CST)
Hmmm. The thesaurus is pretty useless on this one. But I guess it would be over technical content, like the pages for CZ:Templates, CZ:Extensions, and that sort of thing. Stephen Ewen 15:26, 27 December 2007 (CST)
- But how about we just avoid this debate and just be content with "Technical Team". Whatever we call it, it'll still do the same thing! Stephen Ewen 16:09, 27 December 2007 (CST)