Cognition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Michael J. Formica No edit summary |
imported>Michael J. Formica No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
'''Cognition''' is formally dedfined as the ability to recognize and take social[[perspective]]. This indicates the facility of an [[entity]] to recognize the first person (i.e., I, me, mine), the second person or second person plural (i.e., you, yours, you all), and the object of relationship that defines the first and second persons (i.e., it, s/he, they). | '''Cognition''' is formally dedfined as the ability to recognize and take social [[perspective]]. This indicates the facility of an [[entity]] to recognize the first person (i.e., I, me, mine), the second person or second person plural (i.e., you, yours, you all), and the object of relationship that defines the first and second persons (i.e., it, s/he, they). | ||
[[Ken Wilbur]], in his dicussion of the four quadrants that consitute the social component of his teachings on [[Integral Transformative Practice]], includes in this matrix a fourth component; the [[relationship]] defined by the first person, second person, and the object. | [[Ken Wilbur]], in his dicussion of the four quadrants that consitute the social component of his teachings on [[Integral Transformative Practice]], includes in this matrix a fourth component; the [[relationship]] defined by the first person, second person, and the object. | ||
[[Category:Psychology Catalogs]] | [[Category:Psychology Catalogs]] |
Revision as of 07:43, 14 January 2008
Cognition is formally dedfined as the ability to recognize and take social perspective. This indicates the facility of an entity to recognize the first person (i.e., I, me, mine), the second person or second person plural (i.e., you, yours, you all), and the object of relationship that defines the first and second persons (i.e., it, s/he, they).
Ken Wilbur, in his dicussion of the four quadrants that consitute the social component of his teachings on Integral Transformative Practice, includes in this matrix a fourth component; the relationship defined by the first person, second person, and the object.