Talk:Lao Tse: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Yamakuchi
mNo edit summary
imported>David Yamakuchi
m (typo)
Line 15: Line 15:


----
----
Larry: The spelling of Laozi was taked directly from [[Philosophy]], although I'm not sure who added it to that particular article.
Larry: The spelling of Laozi was taken directly from [[Philosophy]], although I'm not sure who added it to that particular article.


Michael: The deleted Buddha reference can stay "excised" if you like, however "some website" is not the only place I have seen it mentioned.  I don't believe it either, I just thought it was worth mentioning that some folks (usually Taoists) make this claim.   
Michael: The deleted Buddha reference can stay "excised" if you like, however "some website" is not the only place I have seen it mentioned.  I don't personally believe it either, I just thought it was worth mentioning that some folks (usually Taoists) sometimes make this claim.   


All: I will of course be happy to abide by the standard format for quotations and paraphrasing, I just don't know what they are.  Perhaps I'll spend some time to read about them soon.  Since I ripped this directly from my "[[Tao Te Ching]]" article, which was one of my first, I seem to recall the formatting was pretty much seat-of-the-pants style.
All: I will of course be happy to abide by the standard format for quotations and paraphrasing, I just don't know what they are.  Perhaps I'll spend some time to read about them soon.  Since I ripped this directly from my "[[Tao Te Ching]]" article, which was one of my first, I seem to recall the formatting was pretty much seat-of-the-pants style.

Revision as of 19:49, 18 January 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (Also Laozi, Lao-tzu; 6th century BCE?) Chinese philosopher, traditionally said to be the author of the Daodejing (Tao Te Ching), the basic text of Daoism. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Philosophy and Religion [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Questions/comments:

  • What really is the most common spelling of this name in English? We should use that for the title. I'm not sure it is "Laozi."
  • "or perhaps even she" -- does anyone think that Lao Tse was, or even could have been, a woman? I'm skeptical.
  • "Various reports have him living somewhere between the 2nd and 6th century BC" -- we can't do better than that?
  • "Lao Zi is believed by some to have been a contemporary of Confucius (551-479 BC), and by others to be a teacher of Confucius." - Again, some sources here would be helpful. Saying "some believe X, others believe Y" does not help anyone to evaluate the merits of X and Y. To do that, we need to know who says X and Y, and why, and whether their opinions hold any weight among those who know about the subject.
  • "...but one popular account goes something like this..." There is no reason for what follows to be in bold and italics, right? Or even inset, or in quotation marks? That isn't actually a quotation, is it? If not, make it part of the text. (If anyone has ever actually said that.
  • "Some accounts of the story have Lao Tsu traveling to India upon his departure and becoming known as Buddha" -- something that interesting and dramatic needs more explanation and also a better source than some website.

--Larry Sanger 13:43, 18 January 2008 (CST)

Larry: I started addressing some of your concerns without even having read this post. I will continue to clean this up. Blessings... --Michael J. Formica 14:30, 18 January 2008 (CST)



Larry: The spelling of Laozi was taken directly from Philosophy, although I'm not sure who added it to that particular article.

Michael: The deleted Buddha reference can stay "excised" if you like, however "some website" is not the only place I have seen it mentioned. I don't personally believe it either, I just thought it was worth mentioning that some folks (usually Taoists) sometimes make this claim.

All: I will of course be happy to abide by the standard format for quotations and paraphrasing, I just don't know what they are. Perhaps I'll spend some time to read about them soon. Since I ripped this directly from my "Tao Te Ching" article, which was one of my first, I seem to recall the formatting was pretty much seat-of-the-pants style.

I do have to say that I'm dissapointed that there seems to be more interest in the spelling of the guy's name than the teaching.

Ch 18 of the Tao Te Ching ...knowledge and wisdom are born along with hypocrisy.... -Translation by Merel

Ch 65 The ancient Masters didn’t try to educate the people, but kindly taught them to not know. When they think that they know the answers, people are difficult to guide. When they know that they don’t know, people can find their own way. -Mitchell

Also, I noticed we have yet to begin an entry for respect. Perhaps someone will be able to assist with that one as well.--David Yamakuchi 16:52, 18 January 2008 (CST)