User talk:Milton Beychok: Difference between revisions
imported>Milton Beychok m (Added a line space) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (→NDOTW & AOTW: new section) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
So things look a bit bare here right now. I don't think that will last long. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 05:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC) | So things look a bit bare here right now. I don't think that will last long. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 05:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
== NDOTW & AOTW == | |||
Hi Milt, | |||
sorry for causing confusion, and thanks for being blunt. The reason I did that was that the AOTW as visible on the Welcome page then did neither link to the approved version nor to the draft, it did not contain an image, and the "read more" started right after the text, with no space in between. Since I cannot edit approved articles, I did a temporary fix and thought I'd marked it clearly as such in my edit summaries. If not, please excuse, and I will pay more attention in the future. However, I honestly hope we can integrate the preparation for transclusion into the approval process (and clear the backlog for those approved so far). We are waiting for Larry to approve the proposed solution via a dedicated Transclusion subpage. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 08:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:25, 25 June 2009
Where Milt lives it is approximately: 07:42
Just archived my last Talk page (Archive 6)
So things look a bit bare here right now. I don't think that will last long. Milton Beychok 05:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
NDOTW & AOTW
Hi Milt, sorry for causing confusion, and thanks for being blunt. The reason I did that was that the AOTW as visible on the Welcome page then did neither link to the approved version nor to the draft, it did not contain an image, and the "read more" started right after the text, with no space in between. Since I cannot edit approved articles, I did a temporary fix and thought I'd marked it clearly as such in my edit summaries. If not, please excuse, and I will pay more attention in the future. However, I honestly hope we can integrate the preparation for transclusion into the approval process (and clear the backlog for those approved so far). We are waiting for Larry to approve the proposed solution via a dedicated Transclusion subpage. --Daniel Mietchen 08:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)