CZ Talk:Editorial Council Resolution 0012: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger (New page: Richard wrote in the "Amendments" section: :I move the word "inactive" be changed to "advisory". Richard Jensen 16:57, 30 June 2008 (CDT) You're free to do so, bu...) |
imported>Larry Sanger mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
You're free to do so, but this isn't the place where you do it. You make motions on the mailing list. Moreover, unless I'm mistaken, you cannot make motions until after the initial discussion period is concluded. (This is explained in our rules, if you're interested.) | You're free to do so, but this isn't the place where you do it. You make motions on the mailing list. Moreover, unless I'm mistaken, you cannot make motions until after the initial discussion period is concluded. (This is explained in our rules, if you're interested.) | ||
I would | I would oppose the amendment. These people are not advisors to us, for the most part, so that too would be dishonest. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 21:21, 30 June 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:21, 30 June 2008
Richard wrote in the "Amendments" section:
- I move the word "inactive" be changed to "advisory". Richard Jensen 16:57, 30 June 2008 (CDT)
You're free to do so, but this isn't the place where you do it. You make motions on the mailing list. Moreover, unless I'm mistaken, you cannot make motions until after the initial discussion period is concluded. (This is explained in our rules, if you're interested.)
I would oppose the amendment. These people are not advisors to us, for the most part, so that too would be dishonest. --Larry Sanger 21:21, 30 June 2008 (CDT)