Online dating: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(rewrote first sentence, added Bold; the couples *don't* have to be "sexually attracted", or certainly not at first....)
imported>Suva Shrestha
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
* '''Collection of User Information'''
* '''Collection of User Information'''
* '''Matching Users'''
* '''Matching Users'''
* '''Communication between users''' .<ref name="Patent">US Patent 6735568 - Method and system for identifying people who are likely to have a successful relationship: http//www.patentstorm.us/patents/6735568/fulltext.html Accessed July 2008</ref>
* '''Communication between users''' .<ref>{{cite web | title=US Patent 6735568: Method and system for identifying people who are likely to have a successful relationship | url=http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6735568/fulltext.html | accessdate=July 12 | accessyear=2008}}</ref>


===Collection of User Information===
===Collection of User Information===

Revision as of 21:53, 16 August 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
Nuvola apps kbounce green.png
Nuvola apps kbounce green.png
This article is currently being developed as part of an Eduzendium student project. The project's homepage is at CZ:CIS 700 Special Topics 2008. One of the goals of the course is to provide students with insider experience in collaborative educational projects, and so you are warmly invited to join in here, or to leave comments on the discussion page. However, please refrain from removing this notice.
Besides, many other Eduzendium articles welcome your collaboration!



Online dating is an internet service that attempts to match couples using a system in which individuals can choose their partners according to such preferences as age, location and race. It is one of the most popular paid services on the Internet.

Upon joining the dating service, the users answer questions from a mandatory survey and create “profiles” of themselves. Such a profile is a webpage that provides information about a user and can be viewed by the other members of the dating service. The users indicate various demographic, socioeconomic, and physical characteristics, such as their age, gender, education level, height, weight, eye and hair color, and income. The users also answer a question on why they joined the service, for example to find a partner for a long- term relationship, or, alternatively, a partner for a “casual” relationship. In addition, the users provide information that relates to their personality, life-style, or views.

With hundreds of millions of members, Internet dating earns greater revenues than any other online subscription service. One study showed that eHarmony alone accounted for 2% of US marriages in a year, that is, 120 marriages per day. We will investigate the methodologies used by these online services in finding appropriate matches, particularly their search algorithms, but also the interfacing tools commonly used and these organizations' histories through the spread of the Internet.

Matrimonials is an ancillary concept applied mostly to international sites, with significantly more determined ends. It is interesting to view how cultures with perhaps traditional views on marriage employ non-traditional technology to facilitate it. We will introduce other relevant sociological issues, such as the cultural significance of the prevalence of online dating and how culture is altered by this prevalence.

History

Business Model

Algorithm

Online dating has turned searching for possible partners similar to other e-commerce websites, like online shopping. To enable this, many different algorithms have been created. Each online dating company boast about their superior technology to show and create better matches. All possible approaches incorporating psychological to mathematical theories have been used.

Though each company may take a different approach, matching personalities is broadly divided into three stages which all companies use:

  • Collection of User Information
  • Matching Users
  • Communication between users .[1]

Collection of User Information

This step starts the very moment a person joins an online dating service. Some people don’t use online dating services for this very step of sharing private information about themselves. The data collected are basically of two types: characteristics data and criteria data. Characteristic data essentially describes the user; while the criteria data is what the user expects out of a possible partner.

Services collect data via various types of questions. There are some direct fundamental ‘yes’ or ‘no’ questions. Some ranking questions, where a user must rank various choices according to his preferences. Some questions where a user is given two possible extremes and he/she may choose anywhere between one extreme to the other and indirect questions which calculate the compatibility of a person. There are also options for users to ask their own constructed questions and also define themselves.

Once all this data is collected it has to be converted using mathematics to allow various algorithms to match people.

Matching Users

The most basic matching is done by the users themselves, when they search the database manually. This gives a lot of control to the user but it is tedious[2]. So to do this automatically, all the responses of the users are converted into compatibility scores (which is relative strength of each match) to mathematically match people. Services look for both complementing and similarity between users to be matched.

All dating services claim trade secrecy of their particular matching algorithm. However, all matching consists of these vital steps that all the services incorporate. Firstly, the data is saved into the data base and converted to numerical scores. Compatibility scores are then calculated. A range is then formed around a person’s compatibility scores to see which other users fall into his/her range. If a person is easy going then his range will generally be higher than a difficult person. If there is very less people in someone’s compatibility range, then they may be asked to change some answers to questions from the previous ‘user information collection’ stage to get a higher volume of possible matches.

During this phase mathematical correlation is used too. Various types of factor analysis are also done. All characteristic and criteria data are considered factors. All factors are given different mathematical values and then depending on how important that particular factor is for the user, it is multiplied by a weight.

Once potential matches are listed, communication between users is facilitated.

Present Trends

Issues

References