Talk:Federation of Straight Chiropractors and Organizations: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
(→‎not being facetious: get it approved)
imported>Hayford Peirce
(→‎not being facetious: an interesting point -- go to Forum)
 
Line 10: Line 10:


:::Or just get it approved and then not have to worry about it :-) [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 02:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
:::Or just get it approved and then not have to worry about it :-) [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 02:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
::::That raises an interesting point, see a new Forum discussion that I will start right now. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 03:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:02, 7 February 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A national organization in the USA that seeks to represent straight chiropractors and straight chiropractic affiliate organizations. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Health Sciences [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup category:  Complementary and alternative medicine
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

not being facetious

Don't you think that fairly near the top of the article you ought to have a little something about the "straight" vs. "gay" usage of the word now? I had to read *deep* into the article before I was certain of the intent.... Hayford Peirce 18:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't think we need to differentiate straight from gay, but in this case could differentiate early about straight vs mixer, which should still satisfy that curiosity. 00:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
That's fine, I guess, for CZ. If this article were in WP, there would be 10,000 screams of outrage. Maybe, a couple of years from now, when there are many more visitors and/or authors, we should make it even clearer. Hayford Peirce 01:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Or just get it approved and then not have to worry about it :-) D. Matt Innis 02:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
That raises an interesting point, see a new Forum discussion that I will start right now. Hayford Peirce 03:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Federation_of_Straight_Chiropractors_and_Organizations&oldid=513955"