Union: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Richard Pinch (see also: Disjoint union) |
imported>Richard Pinch (expanded; supplied references) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Formally, union A ∪ B means that if a ∈ A ∪ B, then a ∈ A ∨ a ∈ B, where ∨ - is logical or. We see this connection between ∪ and ∨ symbols. | Formally, union A ∪ B means that if a ∈ A ∪ B, then a ∈ A ∨ a ∈ B, where ∨ - is logical or. We see this connection between ∪ and ∨ symbols. | ||
The union operation is: | |||
* [[associative]] - (A ∪ B) ∪ C = A ∪ (B ∪ C) | * [[associative]] - (A ∪ B) ∪ C = A ∪ (B ∪ C) | ||
* [[commutative]] - A ∪ B = B ∪ A. | * [[commutative]] - A ∪ B = B ∪ A. | ||
== | ==General unions== | ||
===Finite unions=== | ===Finite unions=== | ||
The union of any finite number of sets may be defined inductively, as | |||
:<math>\bigcup_{i=1}^n X_i = X_1 \cup (X_2 \cup (X_3 \cup (\cdots X_n)\cdots))) . \, </math> | |||
===Infinite unions=== | ===Infinite unions=== | ||
The union of a general family of sets ''X''<sub>λ</sub> as λ ranges over a general index set Λ may be written in similar notation as | |||
:<math>\bigcup_{\lambda\in \Lambda} X_\lambda = \{ x : \exists \lambda \in \Lambda,~x \in X_\lambda \} .\, </math> | |||
We may drop the indexing notation and define the union of a set to be the set of elements of the elements of that set: | |||
:<math>\bigcup X = \{ x : \exists Y \in X,~ x \in Y \} . \,</math> | |||
In this notation the union of two sets ''A'' and ''B'' may be expressed as | |||
:<math>A \cup B = \bigcup \{ A, B \} . \, </math> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* [[Disjoint union]] | * [[Disjoint union]] | ||
==References== | |||
* {{cite book | author=Paul Halmos | authorlink=Paul Halmos | title=Naive set theory | series=The University Series in Undergraduate Mathematics | publisher=[[Van Nostrand Reinhold]] | year=1960 }} | |||
* {{cite book | author=Keith J. Devlin | authorlink=Keith Devlin | title=Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory | series=Universitext | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | year=1979 | isbn=0-387-90441-7 }} |
Revision as of 14:16, 4 November 2008
In set theory, union (denoted as ∪) is a set operation between two sets that forms a set containing the elements of both sets.
Formally, union A ∪ B means that if a ∈ A ∪ B, then a ∈ A ∨ a ∈ B, where ∨ - is logical or. We see this connection between ∪ and ∨ symbols.
The union operation is:
- associative - (A ∪ B) ∪ C = A ∪ (B ∪ C)
- commutative - A ∪ B = B ∪ A.
General unions
Finite unions
The union of any finite number of sets may be defined inductively, as
Infinite unions
The union of a general family of sets Xλ as λ ranges over a general index set Λ may be written in similar notation as
We may drop the indexing notation and define the union of a set to be the set of elements of the elements of that set:
In this notation the union of two sets A and B may be expressed as
See also
References
- Paul Halmos (1960). Naive set theory. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
- Keith J. Devlin (1979). Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-90441-7.