Dmitry Sklyarov: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sandy Harris No edit summary |
imported>Sandy Harris No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
He was arrested in the US after giving a [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Adobe/Gallery/ds-defcon/sld001.htm presentation] at the [[Defcon]] conference revealing that various products for allegedly securing electronic books were in fact [[snake oil (cryptography) | extremely weak]]. He and his employer [[Elcomsoft]] were charged under the [[DMCA]] with distributing illegal tools to circumvent publishers' encryption technology. Both he and the publisher were eventually found [http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-978176.html not guilty] on all charges. | He was arrested in the US after giving a [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Adobe/Gallery/ds-defcon/sld001.htm presentation] at the [[Defcon]] conference revealing that various products for allegedly securing electronic books were in fact [[snake oil (cryptography) | extremely weak]]. He and his employer [[Elcomsoft]] were charged under the [[DMCA]] with distributing illegal tools to circumvent publishers' encryption technology. Both he and the publisher were eventually found [http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-978176.html not guilty] on all charges. | ||
The case became a <i>cause celebre</i> for opponents of the DMCA generally of [[DRM]] technology. The [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]] have a [http://www.eff.org/cases/us-v-elcomsoft-sklyarov summary]. | The case became a <i>cause celebre</i> for opponents of the DMCA, and more generally for critics of [[DRM]] technology. The [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]] have a [http://www.eff.org/cases/us-v-elcomsoft-sklyarov summary]. | ||
Revision as of 18:22, 27 November 2008
Dmitry Sklyarov is a Russian programmer.
He was arrested in the US after giving a presentation at the Defcon conference revealing that various products for allegedly securing electronic books were in fact extremely weak. He and his employer Elcomsoft were charged under the DMCA with distributing illegal tools to circumvent publishers' encryption technology. Both he and the publisher were eventually found not guilty on all charges.
The case became a cause celebre for opponents of the DMCA, and more generally for critics of DRM technology. The Electronic Frontier Foundation have a summary.