Branch Davidians: Difference between revisions
imported>Ed Poor (external link - probably not formatted properly) |
imported>Ed Poor (CS tear gas called "notorious for starting fires") |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The opposing view is that, since the ATF already had a paid informant inside the compound they could get any evidence they needed; that there are ways other than a violent raid, supported with an army tank, and firing tear gas rounds into the building, to gain entry or arrest suspects. | The opposing view is that, since the ATF already had a paid informant inside the compound they could get any evidence they needed; that there are ways other than a violent raid, supported with an army tank, and firing tear gas rounds into the building, to gain entry or arrest suspects. | ||
Controversy also centers around the aftermath of the raid. Most compound residents died during the raid. Various parties dispute the cause of these deaths vigourously. The pro-government side is that the compound residents deliberately set fire to the compound to cause their own deaths: i.e., it was [[mass suicide]]. The anti-government side is that the action of tear gas rounds caused the fire. | Controversy also centers around the aftermath of the raid. Most compound residents died during the raid. Various parties dispute the cause of these deaths vigourously. The pro-government side is that the compound residents deliberately set fire to the compound to cause their own deaths: i.e., it was [[mass suicide]]. The anti-government side is that the action of tear gas rounds caused the fire.<ref>...the FBI chose to flood the Waco compound with CS tear gas despite the obvious dangers. CS is an extremely potent agent designed for riot control. One expert called it the last resort prior to opening fire. CS is not recommended for use by law enforcement when dealing with a barricade situation. CS grenades in particular are notorious for starting fires. [http://www.firearmsandliberty.com/waco.pratt.html]</ref> | ||
==Viewpoints== | ==Viewpoints== | ||
An analysis by David Kopel and Paul Blackman suggests that the original raid was motivated by a desire to get good publicity for the ATF by seizing guns from "cultists". Kopel and Blackman say that the legal issue involved was not whether the guns in question were possessed legally but rather whether the proper taxes had been paid on them. [http://www.constitution.org/2ll/2ndschol/135wac.htm] | An analysis by David Kopel and Paul Blackman suggests that the original raid was motivated by a desire to get good publicity for the ATF by seizing guns from "cultists". Kopel and Blackman say that the legal issue involved was not whether the guns in question were possessed legally but rather whether the proper taxes had been paid on them. [http://www.constitution.org/2ll/2ndschol/135wac.htm] | ||
==Notes== | |||
<references /> | |||
Revision as of 12:59, 26 January 2009
In 1993, the Branch Davidians sect, led by David Koresh, had their compound in Waco, Texas, raided by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). Church opponents and church supporters disagreed over whether a raid was "necessary".
The ATF view was that it was necessary to get inside the church compound, in order to use warrants to conduct a search to find evidence that compound residents had violated various federal laws. There was also a DOJ concern that young teen girls had been forced into polygamy with Koresh.
The opposing view is that, since the ATF already had a paid informant inside the compound they could get any evidence they needed; that there are ways other than a violent raid, supported with an army tank, and firing tear gas rounds into the building, to gain entry or arrest suspects.
Controversy also centers around the aftermath of the raid. Most compound residents died during the raid. Various parties dispute the cause of these deaths vigourously. The pro-government side is that the compound residents deliberately set fire to the compound to cause their own deaths: i.e., it was mass suicide. The anti-government side is that the action of tear gas rounds caused the fire.[1]
Viewpoints
An analysis by David Kopel and Paul Blackman suggests that the original raid was motivated by a desire to get good publicity for the ATF by seizing guns from "cultists". Kopel and Blackman say that the legal issue involved was not whether the guns in question were possessed legally but rather whether the proper taxes had been paid on them. [2]
Notes
- ↑ ...the FBI chose to flood the Waco compound with CS tear gas despite the obvious dangers. CS is an extremely potent agent designed for riot control. One expert called it the last resort prior to opening fire. CS is not recommended for use by law enforcement when dealing with a barricade situation. CS grenades in particular are notorious for starting fires. [1]