Nativism (psychology): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(stub)
 
imported>Meg Taylor
m (spelling: withe -> with the)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
{{dambigbox|nativism in psychology, linguistics, and cognitive science|nativism}}
{{dambigbox|nativism in psychology, linguistics, and cognitive science|nativism}}
'''Nativism''', in the sense familiar to scholars of [[linguistics]], [[psychology]] and [[cognition]], proposes that certain key traits of a [[species]] are not [[learning|learned]] but emerge from a [[mind]] that is in some way already set up to deal with the environment in which it will develop and function. This theory identifies [[language]] as a prime example of an 'instinct' that is unlearnable; instead, thanks to linguistic mechanisms set out in the [[human]] mind by [[gene]]s, language is '[[innatism|innate]]' and therefore [[language acquisition|acquired]] in a way that is largely outside its user's conscious control, much in the same way that humans also start to [[walking|walk]] and [[bird]]s take flight. Environmental forces also play a role - children not exposed to language will go without it - but withe minimum of linguistic input, language is acquired according to an innate developmental template. 'Nativists' such as [[Steven Pinker]] also see the language 'instinct' as a provided by a specific mental 'module' for language, though others prefer to explain language and other abilities in terms of 'general cognition'.
'''Nativism''', in the sense familiar to scholars of [[linguistics]], [[psychology]] and [[cognition]], proposes that certain key traits of a [[species]] are not [[learning|learned]] but emerge from a [[mind]] that is in some way already set up to deal with the environment in which it will develop and function. This theory identifies [[language]] as a prime example of an 'instinct' that is unlearnable; instead, thanks to linguistic mechanisms set out in the [[human]] mind by [[gene]]s, language is '[[innatism|innate]]' and therefore [[language acquisition|acquired]] in a way that is largely outside its user's conscious control, much in the same way that humans also start to [[walking|walk]] and [[bird]]s take flight. Environmental forces also play a role - children not exposed to language will go without it - but with the minimum of linguistic input, language is acquired according to an innate developmental template. 'Nativists' such as [[Steven Pinker]] also see the language 'instinct' as a provided by a specific mental 'module' for language, though others prefer to explain language and other abilities in terms of 'general cognition'.


Nativism is strongly associated with [[Noam Chomsky]]'s views on language acquisition, and is contrasted with the [[empiricism]] of [[B.F. Skinner]] and other [[behaviorism|behaviourists]], who saw reference to 'innate' characteristics as unscientific and preferred explanations that relied on he organism's interaction with its environment; complex 'behaviour' such as language would fall out automatically. Chomsky pointed to fundamental concerns in the behaviourist case for language as an environmental phenomenon, and later champions of nativism have sought clues to how language and other traits are part of the human species by looking at the [[genome]] and the structure of the [[brain]].
Nativism is strongly associated with [[Noam Chomsky]]'s views on language acquisition, and is contrasted with the [[empiricism]] of [[B.F. Skinner]] and other [[behaviorism|behaviourists]], who saw reference to 'innate' characteristics as unscientific and preferred explanations that relied on he organism's interaction with its environment; complex 'behaviour' such as language would fall out automatically. Chomsky pointed to fundamental concerns in the behaviourist case for language as an environmental phenomenon, and later champions of nativism have sought clues to how language and other traits are part of the human species by looking at the [[genome]] and the structure of the [[brain]].

Revision as of 00:37, 15 February 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
This article is about nativism in psychology, linguistics, and cognitive science. For other uses of the term nativism, please see nativism (disambiguation).

Nativism, in the sense familiar to scholars of linguistics, psychology and cognition, proposes that certain key traits of a species are not learned but emerge from a mind that is in some way already set up to deal with the environment in which it will develop and function. This theory identifies language as a prime example of an 'instinct' that is unlearnable; instead, thanks to linguistic mechanisms set out in the human mind by genes, language is 'innate' and therefore acquired in a way that is largely outside its user's conscious control, much in the same way that humans also start to walk and birds take flight. Environmental forces also play a role - children not exposed to language will go without it - but with the minimum of linguistic input, language is acquired according to an innate developmental template. 'Nativists' such as Steven Pinker also see the language 'instinct' as a provided by a specific mental 'module' for language, though others prefer to explain language and other abilities in terms of 'general cognition'.

Nativism is strongly associated with Noam Chomsky's views on language acquisition, and is contrasted with the empiricism of B.F. Skinner and other behaviourists, who saw reference to 'innate' characteristics as unscientific and preferred explanations that relied on he organism's interaction with its environment; complex 'behaviour' such as language would fall out automatically. Chomsky pointed to fundamental concerns in the behaviourist case for language as an environmental phenomenon, and later champions of nativism have sought clues to how language and other traits are part of the human species by looking at the genome and the structure of the brain.

Footnotes