Talk:Diabesity: Difference between revisions
imported>Katie Rowland No edit summary |
imported>Celine Caquineau No edit summary |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
[[User:Katie Rowland|Katie Rowland]] 09:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)I've put in some references for my bibliography section - as I don't know what im supposed to be doing Ive gone along the treatment line - if this is wrong just let me know asap! Also are our review and primary research papers supposed to be put on seperatly in different sections? | [[User:Katie Rowland|Katie Rowland]] 09:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)I've put in some references for my bibliography section - as I don't know what im supposed to be doing Ive gone along the treatment line - if this is wrong just let me know asap! Also are our review and primary research papers supposed to be put on seperatly in different sections? | ||
Katie, you need indeed to place your references in the appropriate 'reviews' or 'research papers' sections.[[User:Celine Caquineau|Celine Caquineau]] 13:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Overall, I agree with John and Katie, you need to discuss your plan (nice start John)! I encourage you to meet or at least use the talkpage. | |||
Luke, you've written your section but you still need to participate in the overall structure and organisation of the article. You also have to update the bibliography page with your references. | |||
Charlie and Nicholas, your group need your contributions!!! Charlie, I need to know whether you're still here! [[User:Celine Caquineau|Celine Caquineau]] 13:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:37, 21 October 2009
Charlie Player 20:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC) Nicholas Devlin 11:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
John Park 12:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Luke, good start, remember to update the bibliography page with your key readings. John, nice selection too. Charlie and Nicholas, im looking forward to read your contribution! Celine Caquineau 09:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
John Park GUYS!!!! we need input! I dont want to sound pedantic but getting a wee bit worried about how we are going to write this up. We need to meet up I think, and organise on structure. What each is going to write. etc.
I've put up a brief intro. I know its not very good but at least its a start. I was thinking Diabesity -
Intro - (the increasing trend of obesity, and the huge increase in rates of diabetes )
The relationship between Diabetes and Obesity (causal evidence and studies etc)
The Pathophysiology of how obesity can lead to Diabetes (maybe your bit Luke plus other things)
Treatments
Future work
Collaborations (e.g. Diabesity the EU project etc)
Just a start. !!!! But suggestions please!!!
Katie Rowland 08:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC) Hey everyone,sorry Ive only just got on - only got my account thing activated this morning! I agree we need to get things going, should we meet up to discuss? Or just split the sections? Im happy with that plan John, Im happy to do a section on treatment if no-one else has done that yet? Read the intro you did John and its a great start.
Welcome to Citizendium Katie. John, I think your plan looks really good. Still waiting for Charlie's and Nicholas' inputs... Nancy Sabatier 09:29, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Katie Rowland 09:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)I've put in some references for my bibliography section - as I don't know what im supposed to be doing Ive gone along the treatment line - if this is wrong just let me know asap! Also are our review and primary research papers supposed to be put on seperatly in different sections?
Katie, you need indeed to place your references in the appropriate 'reviews' or 'research papers' sections.Celine Caquineau 13:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Overall, I agree with John and Katie, you need to discuss your plan (nice start John)! I encourage you to meet or at least use the talkpage. Luke, you've written your section but you still need to participate in the overall structure and organisation of the article. You also have to update the bibliography page with your references. Charlie and Nicholas, your group need your contributions!!! Charlie, I need to know whether you're still here! Celine Caquineau 13:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Eduzendium Category Check
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Developed Articles
- Health Sciences Advanced Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Eduzendium Developed Articles
- Eduzendium Advanced Articles
- Eduzendium Nonstub Articles
- Eduzendium Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Eduzendium Underlinked Articles