User:Nick Gardner /Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
[[User:Nick_Gardner#Methodology|methodology]]
[[User:Nick_Gardner#Methodology|methodology]]


==Concepts==
The term human rights is used to refer  to one of two mutually exclusive mental constructs:<br>
The term human rights is used to refer  to one of two mutually exclusive mental constructs:<br>
-  an ethical construct denoting  entitlements that are deemed to be rightfully inherent in the existence of every human being, and whose rightful existence is deemed to be independent of  other considerations; or,<br>
-  an ethical construct denoting  entitlements that are deemed to be rightfully inherent in the existence of every human being, and whose rightful existence is deemed to be independent of  other considerations; or,<br>
- a social construct denoting  entitlements that are  to be conferred upon individuals by the community and which are to be subject to socially-determined limitations  that include those arising from conflicts of interest with other individuals.<br>
- a social construct denoting  entitlements that are  to be conferred upon individuals by the community and which are to be subject to socially-determined limitations  that include those arising from conflicts of interest with other individuals.<br>
The best-known example of its use as an ethical construct is in the American [[Declaration of Independence]] which took it to be "self-evident" that everyone had "certain inalienable rights". Its use in that sense cannot be put into practical operation because it is definitionally  precluded  from meeting the operational need to resolve conflicts of human rights.  The need to resolve such conflicts would normally require  the entitlement to be conditional upon additional  factors  beyond those that are deemed  inherent in human existence,  as a result of which the rights would cease to be absolute or "inalienable". Those additional factors concern what are deemed to be the rightful relation between the entitlements of an individual and those of other members of the community, the inclusion of which is a feature of social constructs such as those of the nine  United Nations  human rights conventions.
The best-known example of its use as an ethical construct is in the American [[Declaration of Independence]] which took it to be "self-evident" that everyone had "certain inalienable rights". Its use in that sense cannot be put into practical operation because it is definitionally  precluded  from meeting the operational need to resolve conflicts of human rights.  The need to resolve such conflicts would normally require  the entitlement to be conditional upon additional  factors  beyond those that are deemed  inherent in human existence,  as a result of which the rights would cease to be absolute or "inalienable". Those additional factors concern what are deemed to be the rightful relation between the entitlements of an individual and those of other members of the community, the inclusion of which is a feature of social constructs such as those of the nine  United Nations  human rights conventions.
==Background==
===Origins===
The term human rights is nowadays applied to a concept that emerged in the 17th century,  which differed from previous concepts in the intention that it should apply to every human being, regardless of nationality, sex or age.
==Declarations==
===Objections==
==Organisations==
===Conventions===
==Legislation==
==Political reactions==
===Domestic===
===International===

Revision as of 09:35, 5 August 2012

Index and Glossary

There is an index to the topics dealt with in the economics articles here, and a glossary of economic terms here.

See also the index to the politics articles .

methodology


Concepts

The term human rights is used to refer to one of two mutually exclusive mental constructs:
- an ethical construct denoting entitlements that are deemed to be rightfully inherent in the existence of every human being, and whose rightful existence is deemed to be independent of other considerations; or,
- a social construct denoting entitlements that are to be conferred upon individuals by the community and which are to be subject to socially-determined limitations that include those arising from conflicts of interest with other individuals.
The best-known example of its use as an ethical construct is in the American Declaration of Independence which took it to be "self-evident" that everyone had "certain inalienable rights". Its use in that sense cannot be put into practical operation because it is definitionally precluded from meeting the operational need to resolve conflicts of human rights. The need to resolve such conflicts would normally require the entitlement to be conditional upon additional factors beyond those that are deemed inherent in human existence, as a result of which the rights would cease to be absolute or "inalienable". Those additional factors concern what are deemed to be the rightful relation between the entitlements of an individual and those of other members of the community, the inclusion of which is a feature of social constructs such as those of the nine United Nations human rights conventions.

Background

Origins

The term human rights is nowadays applied to a concept that emerged in the 17th century, which differed from previous concepts in the intention that it should apply to every human being, regardless of nationality, sex or age.

Declarations

=Objections

Organisations

Conventions

Legislation

Political reactions

Domestic

International