War crime: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
'''War crimes''' are, generally, acts that violated the laws of war that applied in the jurisdiction and time of occurrence. That being said, there is abundant precedent for the trial and conviction of defendants in an ''ad hoc'' tribunal that enforced issues ''[[ex post facto]]'', because the offense had not been considered prewar, but, such as [[genocide]], met a consensus of qualifying as egregious conduct, perhaps under the doctrine of ''[[hostis humani generis]]'' or of [[just war theory]].
'''War crimes''' are, generally, acts that violated the laws of war that applied in the jurisdiction and time of occurrence. That being said, there is abundant precedent for the trial and conviction of defendants in an ''ad hoc'' tribunal that enforced issues ''[[ex post facto]]'', because the offense had not been considered prewar, but, such as [[genocide]], met a consensus of qualifying as egregious conduct, perhaps under the doctrine of ''[[hostis humani generis]]'' or of [[just war theory]].


In the present international environment, the most important definitions are in the [[Geneva Conventions]]. There are complex issues when dealing with  national decisions, such as the doctrine of [[command responsibility]] stated in the [[in re Yamashita]] decision. International law has generally not stayed abreast of non-state actors accused of [[terrorism]] or [[genocide|genocide, democide, or "ethnic cleansing"]].
In the present international environment, the most important definitions are in the [[Geneva Conventions]]. There are complex issues when dealing with  national decisions, such as the doctrine of [[command responsibility]] stated in the [[in re Yamashita]] decision. International law has generally not stayed abreast of non-state actors accused of [[terrorism]] or [[genocide|genocide, democide, or "ethnic cleansing"]].


Not all those individuals accused of war crimes have come to trial. [[Adolf Hitler]], [[Josef Goebbels]] and [[Heinrich Himmler]] all committed suicide before any legal process, and were not tried ''in absentia'' as was [[Martin Bormann]]. "War criminal" has become a [[term of art]] for those for whom there was abundant evidence, often in sworn testimony, but were never formally prosecuted due to their death or, as in the case of [[Josef Mengele]], escape.
==Aftermath of WWII]]==
Post-WWII tribunals at Nuremberg and Tokyo did rule ''ex post facto'' in matters such as [[crimes against peace]], although there was some legal background such as the [[Kellogg-Briand Pact]] and the [[Hague Conventions]].
Post-WWII tribunals at Nuremberg and Tokyo did rule ''ex post facto'' in matters such as [[crimes against peace]], although there was some legal background such as the [[Kellogg-Briand Pact]] and the [[Hague Conventions]].
==International Criminal Court==
==International Criminal Court==

Revision as of 18:06, 13 November 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

War crimes are, generally, acts that violated the laws of war that applied in the jurisdiction and time of occurrence. That being said, there is abundant precedent for the trial and conviction of defendants in an ad hoc tribunal that enforced issues ex post facto, because the offense had not been considered prewar, but, such as genocide, met a consensus of qualifying as egregious conduct, perhaps under the doctrine of hostis humani generis or of just war theory.

In the present international environment, the most important definitions are in the Geneva Conventions. There are complex issues when dealing with national decisions, such as the doctrine of command responsibility stated in the in re Yamashita decision. International law has generally not stayed abreast of non-state actors accused of terrorism or genocide, democide, or "ethnic cleansing".

Not all those individuals accused of war crimes have come to trial. Adolf Hitler, Josef Goebbels and Heinrich Himmler all committed suicide before any legal process, and were not tried in absentia as was Martin Bormann. "War criminal" has become a term of art for those for whom there was abundant evidence, often in sworn testimony, but were never formally prosecuted due to their death or, as in the case of Josef Mengele, escape.

Aftermath of WWII]]

Post-WWII tribunals at Nuremberg and Tokyo did rule ex post facto in matters such as crimes against peace, although there was some legal background such as the Kellogg-Briand Pact and the Hague Conventions.

International Criminal Court

U.S. law

U.S. law defines war crimes principally in terms of the Geneva Conventions. The statute does not address the requirements of trial and conviction. [1] "war crime” means any conduct—

  1. defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party;
  2. prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907;
  3. which constitutes a grave breach of common Article 3 (as defined in subsection (d)) when committed in the context of and in association with an armed conflict not of an international character; or
  4. of a person who, in relation to an armed conflict and contrary to the provisions of the Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices as amended at Geneva on 3 May 1996 (Protocol II as amended on 3 May 1996), when the United States is a party to such Protocol, willfully kills or causes serious injury to civilians.

References