CZ:Featured article/Current: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park
(→‎Mind-body problem: 2012 doomsday prophecy)
imported>John Stephenson
({{:Flash Point (novel)}})
Line 1: Line 1:
== '''[[2012 doomsday prophecy]]''' ==
{{:Flash Point (novel)}}
----
'''2012''' doomsday predictions were irrational fears fueled by certain booksellers, fearmongers, moviemakers and other hucksters to encourage public panic for the purpose of making money. The hoax used dubious claims about [[astronomy]] and ancient Mayan calendars to promote nonsensical predictions regarding apocalyptic events supposed to occur on December 21st or 23rd of 2012. Doomsayers suggested there will be destruction caused by global floods, solar flares, exploding sun, reversals of the magnetic field, or planetary collisions.<ref name=twsMar14g>{{cite news
|author= Maria Puente
|title= Oh, Maya! Is 2012 the end? Film boosts doomsday frenzy
|publisher= USA Today
|date= 2009-11-12
|url= http://www.usatoday.com/life/lifestyle/2009-11-12-2012_CV_N.htm
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref><ref name=twsMar14k>{{cite news
|title= Scared Of Planet Nibiru? NASA Would Like To Help
|publisher= NPR
|date= November 15, 2009
|url= http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120436493
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref> Many people are scared.<ref name=twsMar14f>{{cite news
|author=  Brian Handwerk
|title= 2012 Prophecies Sparking Real Fears, Suicide Warnings
|publisher= Huffington Post, National Geographic News
|date= 2009-11-10
|url= http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/10/2012-prophecies-sparking_n_352296.html
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref><ref name=twsMar14m>{{cite news
|author= CHRISTINE BROUWER
|title= Will the World End in 2012?
|publisher= ABC News
|date= July 3, 2008
|url= http://a.abcnews.com/international/story?id=5301284&page=1
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref>
 
Scientists agree 2012 doomsday forecasts are "bunk".<ref name=twsMar14b>{{cite news
|author= Mark Stevenson, Associated Press
|title= Scientists debunk 2012 as doomsday date
|publisher= San Francisco Chronicle
|date= October 11, 2009
|url= http://articles.sfgate.com/2009-10-11/news/17183490_1_meteor-tablet-stone
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref><ref name=twsMar14e>{{cite news
|author= DENNIS OVERBYE
|title= Is Doomsday Coming? Perhaps, but Not in 2012 
|publisher= The New York Times
|date= November 16, 2009
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/science/17essay.html
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref>
 
The 2012 doomsday pop culture phenomenon was similar in many respects to the "Y2K" phenomenon which marked New Year's Eve in 1999, when the new millennium happened. The hysteria has also been compared to the panic created by Orson Welles radio program ''War of the Worlds''. But the "2012 apocalypse business is booming", according to the ''Huffington Post''. The 2012 doomsday prediction was one more example of a patten repeated over the centuries; for example, Baptist preacher William Miller convinced perhaps a hundred thousand Americans that the second coming of [[Jesus Christ]] would happen in 1843; it didn't. Doomsday predictions tend to be within the span of about ten years from the present, according to University of Wisconsin historian Paul Boyer, since the sense of "imminence" and that it will "happen soon" is necessary for these hysterias to catch the public imagination.<ref name=twsMar14f/>
[[Image:Planet.jpg|thumb|left|alt=Planet.|Planet "Nibiru" doesn't exist except in the minds of believers of disaster scenarios such as 2012.]]
 
''[[2012 doomsday prophecy|.... (read more)]]''
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;"
|-
! style="text-align: center;" | &nbsp;[[2012 doomsday prophecy#References|notes]]
|-
|
{{reflist|2}}
|}

Revision as of 06:11, 25 August 2020

The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on CZ pages.

This article is about Flash Point (Gilbert novel). For other uses of the term Flash Point, please see Flash Point (disambiguation).
(CC) Photo: Jerry Bauer
Michael Gilbert on the back cover of Mr. Calder and Mr. Behrens, 1982

Flash Point is a 1974 novel by the British author Michael Gilbert published in England by Hodder and Stoughton and in the United States by Harper & Row. It was Gilbert's 17th novel and undoubtedly written during the last days of the American Watergate scandal. Although none of the events in the book directly parallel those of Watergate, it begins with a banal legal matter and then escalates into a government cover-up and national scandal. The American edition has an apparent subtitle shown only on its copyright page: "A Harper Novel of Law and Lawlessness". Like a number of other works by Gilbert and his near contemporaries Victor Canning and Ross Thomas, it is less a standard novel of suspense than a political thriller about the amorality and subsequent lethal reactions of those in the highest government positions when confronted by seemingly trivial events that blossom uncontrollably into perceived challenges to their positions.

Plot

Written with Gilbert's usual urbane and understated style, the events mostly take place in and around London, as is customary in most of his books: in sundry law offices, courts, government offices, and gentlemen's clubs. Gilbert himself was a most Establishment figure, frequently writing about other Establishment figures, and was usually firmly on the side of England's police forces and shadowy (though lethal) Intelligent departments. But perhaps because of his many years of legal practice, he was also equally at home in filling his narratives with other types of characters: sleazy strip-club owners, tough and semi-crooked policemen, hard-bitten union officials, factory workers, relentless and unscrupulous Intelligent agents, and a wide variety of hard-boiled villains and crooks from small-time burglars and con men to gangster chieftains.

Flash Point begins with Jonas Killey, an obscure but obstinate and somewhat truculent solicitor with a small practice in Wimbledon, attempting to bring charges against Will Dylan, a rising young politician, for what he purports to be the embezzlement of funds during Dylan's handling of the merger of two small labor unions several years before. The facts are obscure, the documentation equally obscure, the matter of no interest to anyone except Killey; the various Law Societies and associated bodies to whom he appeals for help in pursuing his claims are reluctant to take up the matter. The story unfolds through the points of view of various legal and political personalities, and little by little Killey succeeds in bringing the matter to wider public attention—at the cost of drawing into the picture a number of unscrupulous characters, communist trades union men apparently acting on his behalf, and an even more unscrupulous intelligence department's chief acting to discredit Killey and suppress the entire matter. Much of the ensuing book takes place in lawyer's chambers, magistrates' courts, newspaper offices, and the occasional meeting between high government officials, including the Prime Minister himself. By the time the book ends, the cover-up has become a newspaper sensation comparable to the Watergate scandal of that time in the United States and in the ensuing election the Prime Minister and his party are turned out of office. Unlike most other Gilbert books, however, all of the violence is of the non-lethal kind: people are threatened, roughed up, and actually beaten, but the only two fatalities in the story are inadvertent. There is, nevertheless, a sharp edge to the entire story that is entirely in keeping with what one of Gilbert's American editors said about him after his death in 2006, many years after the publication of Flash Point:

"He's not a hard-boiled writer in the classic sense, but there is a hard edge to him, a feeling within his work that not all of society is rational, that virtue is not always rewarded.".[1] Such is the case in Flash Point, although Jonas Killey himself, the uncompromising instigator of so much national drama, ends up in surprisingly benign circumstances in totally different, non-legalist surroundings.

Reception

Newgate Callendar, the mystery critic of the New York Times, gave it a very favorable review, saying that:

Michael Gilbert's FLASH POINT (Harper & Row, $6.95) examines certain aspects of the British Parliamentary system and does not like what it sees. Gilbert, himself a lawyer, works up a situation where, in an effort to stop a legal case, the British Government steps in and subverts the basic rights of citizens. Gilbert poses big questions that carry the ethical problems straight up to the Prime Minister. The analogy to certain doings in the United States Government of recent vintage is not once mentioned, but obviously Gilbert had it on his mind. The ending of “Flash Point,” however, is a bit weak. It is as though Gilbert did not know exactly how to resolve the plot, and there is the sudden, unconvincing reversal of character of several key figures. Nevertheless a strong, well‐written book.[2]

Notes

  1. Douglas Greene of Crippen & Landrau, quoted in The New York Times, 15 February 2006
  2. The New York Times, 19 January 1975 at https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1975/01/19/76329705.html?pageNumber=251

See also