Talk:Pompeii: Difference between revisions
imported>Russell D. Jones (→Map: another city) |
imported>Russell D. Jones (→Captions: Textual criticism) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
====Captions==== | ====Captions==== | ||
The caption to the amphitheater reads like the photo is actually of the riot. It's not, it's a photo of "The amphitheater in which a riot occurred between Roman soldiers and Campanians in 59BC." Also, it's not clear in the text that the riot was <u>in</u> the amphitheater which is what the caption seems to say. | The caption to the amphitheater reads like the photo is actually of the riot. It's not, it's a photo of "The amphitheater in which a riot occurred between Roman soldiers and Campanians in 59BC." Also, it's not clear in the text that the riot was <u>in</u> the amphitheater which is what the caption seems to say. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 20:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
====Textual criticisms==== | |||
Regarding in the Vesuvius section: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
"Project Gutenburg hosts a free early 20th-century translation of Pliny the Younger's letters, including his account of Vesuvius' eruption [7]. A more recent translation can be found in Cooley & Cooley, Pompeii: a sourcebook, from page 32 onward [8]</blockquote> | |||
I'm not sure that the textual criticism belongs in the article text itself. It seems out of place here. The article is talking about the vesuvius eruption and starts talking about Project Gutenberg. I think the comments about the sources would be better located in the notes or in the bibliography. See above for comment about the links. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 20:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:20, 25 October 2012
Approval Process: Call for review
Call for review: Richard Nevell 20:44, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Call for Approval:
Approval Notice:
Certification of Approval:
Please discuss the article below, Pompeii/Approval is for brief official referee's only!
Comments
Underlinked
I haven't read through much of this yet, but I can see that it is currently under-linked. Every topic, whether a current CZ article or not, should be linked. Russell D. Jones 17:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Map
I wonder if it's possible to get a map of the place to help a reader situate where Pompeii is. If the map has Cumea, Naples, Misenum, Stabiae and Herculaneum on it too, it could be used on those pages too. Russell D. Jones 20:04, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Captions
The caption to the amphitheater reads like the photo is actually of the riot. It's not, it's a photo of "The amphitheater in which a riot occurred between Roman soldiers and Campanians in 59BC." Also, it's not clear in the text that the riot was in the amphitheater which is what the caption seems to say. Russell D. Jones 20:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Textual criticisms
Regarding in the Vesuvius section:
"Project Gutenburg hosts a free early 20th-century translation of Pliny the Younger's letters, including his account of Vesuvius' eruption [7]. A more recent translation can be found in Cooley & Cooley, Pompeii: a sourcebook, from page 32 onward [8]
I'm not sure that the textual criticism belongs in the article text itself. It seems out of place here. The article is talking about the vesuvius eruption and starts talking about Project Gutenberg. I think the comments about the sources would be better located in the notes or in the bibliography. See above for comment about the links. Russell D. Jones 20:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)