Talk:Deepak Chopra: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subpages}}")
 
(Introduction added)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
==Introduction and reason for this article being here==
Whether you love him or hate him, you can't argue that this man is a force of nature, and has changed American medicine and healing. He definitely is worthy of an encyclopedia entry. Hopefully, that entry will give his whole life a fair hearing and not try to present one viewpoint over another. I feel that the Wikipedia article in 2023 about Dr. Chopra is biased and heavily pushing a scientific reductionist view. This is particularly a problem with dealing with this healer and physician originally from India, who has a long history of infusing spirituality into physical healing, and integrating empirical, medical knowledge with that of spiritual realization...an article on such an individual should not be a purely skeptical science hack job on a doctor that dares to speaks of things beyond mechanistic pharmaceuticals and biochemistry. I have rewritten the article. [[User:Jack S. Byrom|Jack S. Byrom]] ([[User talk:Jack S. Byrom|talk]]) 22:23, 13 March 2023 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:24, 13 March 2023

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Indian-American physician, author, and alternative medicine advocate. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Health Sciences, Food Science and Topic Informant [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Introduction and reason for this article being here

Whether you love him or hate him, you can't argue that this man is a force of nature, and has changed American medicine and healing. He definitely is worthy of an encyclopedia entry. Hopefully, that entry will give his whole life a fair hearing and not try to present one viewpoint over another. I feel that the Wikipedia article in 2023 about Dr. Chopra is biased and heavily pushing a scientific reductionist view. This is particularly a problem with dealing with this healer and physician originally from India, who has a long history of infusing spirituality into physical healing, and integrating empirical, medical knowledge with that of spiritual realization...an article on such an individual should not be a purely skeptical science hack job on a doctor that dares to speaks of things beyond mechanistic pharmaceuticals and biochemistry. I have rewritten the article. Jack S. Byrom (talk) 22:23, 13 March 2023 (CDT)