Spoils system: Difference between revisions
imported>Joe Quick m (subpages) |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "New York City" to "New York City") |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The separation between political activity and the civil service was made stronger with the [[Hatch Act]]s of 1939 and 1940 which prohibited federal employees, such as WPA workers and supervisors, from engaging in political activities while on the job. | The separation between political activity and the civil service was made stronger with the [[Hatch Act]]s of 1939 and 1940 which prohibited federal employees, such as WPA workers and supervisors, from engaging in political activities while on the job. | ||
The spoils system survived much longer in many states, counties and municipalities, such as the [[Tammany Hall]] ring, which survived well into the 1930s when [[New York City]] reformed its own civil service. Illinois modernized its bureaucracy in 1917 under Governor [[Frank Lowden]], but Chicago only changed over in the 1970s. | The spoils system survived much longer in many states, counties and municipalities, such as the [[Tammany Hall]] ring, which survived well into the 1930s when [[New York, New York|New York City]] reformed its own civil service. Illinois modernized its bureaucracy in 1917 under Governor [[Frank Lowden]], but Chicago only changed over in the 1970s. | ||
==Bibliography== | ==Bibliography== | ||
Revision as of 09:18, 8 April 2023
In American politics, a spoils system refers to an informal practice by which a party after winning an election gives government jobs to its supporters as a reward for working toward victory, and as an incentive to keep working for the party. The term was derived from the phrase "to the victor go the spoils." It is opposed to a system of awarding offices on the bass of some measure of merit independent of political activity.
Spoils systems are endemic in traditional politics where patronage is used to favor tribal organization or other kinship groups and localism in general.
Beginnings
During the First Party System a spoils system was pioneered by New York governors in the early 19th century, most notably DeWitt Clinton. At the federal level Thomas Jefferson systematically reviewed the civil list, and list of military officers, when he became president in 1801 with the goal of neutralizing the overwhelming advantage held by the opposition during the First Party System. President John Quincy Adams tried to be nonpartisan in his appointments in 1825, but quickly discovered that caused problems. "On such appointments all the wormwood and gall of the old party hatred squeeze out. A vacancy to any office had occurred and there was a distinguishing Federalist started and pushed home as a candidate to fill it, always well qualified, sometimes in an eminent degree, and yet so obnoxious to the Republican party, that they cannot be appointed without exciting a vehement clamor against him and the administration. It becomes thus impossible to fill any vacancy in appointment without offending one half of the community."[1]
After he became president in 1828 Andrew Jackson systematically rewarded his supporters to start off the Second Party System. He considered that popular election gave the victorious party a "mandate" to select officials from its own ranks. Proponents claimed that ordinary Americans were able to discharge the official duties of government offices - not just a special civil service elite. Opponents considered it vulnerable to incompetence and corruption, just like the systems it followed and preceded.
The Third Party System, 1854-1896 was the apogee of the spoils system. It was used quite effectively by Abraham Lincoln in supporting both his Republican party and the Union war effort. On the other hand Democrat Grover Cleveland and his Bourbon Democrats gained prestige by belittling the system. By the late 1860s reformers were demanding a civil service system. Running as Liberal Republicans in 1872, they were badly defeated by patronage-hungry Ulysses S. Grant. Mugwumps were Republican reformers who in 1884 deserted their party to support Democrat Grover Cleveland, a champion of civil service reform. Theodore Roosevelt gained fame as a civil service reformer in the 1890s.
The Pendleton Act of 1883 created a bipartisan Civil Service Commission that evaluated job candidates on a nonpartisan merit basis. The law allowed the president to transfer jobs (and their current holders) into the system, thus giving the holder a permanent job. From 1885 to 1897 the White House changed hands four times and after each election the outgoing president applied the Pendleton law to thousands of people (his own supporters). By 1900 most federal jobs were handled through civil service and the spoils system was limited only to very senior positions.
The separation between political activity and the civil service was made stronger with the Hatch Acts of 1939 and 1940 which prohibited federal employees, such as WPA workers and supervisors, from engaging in political activities while on the job.
The spoils system survived much longer in many states, counties and municipalities, such as the Tammany Hall ring, which survived well into the 1930s when New York City reformed its own civil service. Illinois modernized its bureaucracy in 1917 under Governor Frank Lowden, but Chicago only changed over in the 1970s.
Bibliography
- Griffith; Ernest S. The Modern Development of City Government in the United Kingdom and the United States (1927) online edition
- Hoogenboom, Ari Arthur. Outlawing the Spoils: A history of the civil service reform movement, 1865-1883 (1961)
- Ostrogorski, M. Democracy and the Party System in the United States (1910) online edition
- Rubio, Philip F. A History of Affirmative Action, 1619-2000 University Press of Mississippi, 2001 online edition
- ↑ Josiah Quincy, Memoir of the Life of John Quincy Adams 1858 p. 148