Integral Fast Reactor: Difference between revisions
(add ref on IFR proliferation rtisk) |
(add paragraph on proliferation risk) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
5) There is no high pressure or any water near the reactor vessel.<br> | 5) There is no high pressure or any water near the reactor vessel.<br> | ||
6) The entire reactor chamber can be flooded with Argon, eliminating the possibility of a sodium fire.<br> | 6) The entire reactor chamber can be flooded with Argon, eliminating the possibility of a sodium fire.<br> | ||
Tests were conducted at Idaho National Laboratory in which the primary coolant pump was stopped with the reactor running at full power. The reactor shut itself down with no damage.<ref name= | Tests were conducted at Idaho National Laboratory in which the primary coolant pump was stopped with the reactor running at full power. The reactor shut itself down with no damage.<ref name=IFRtests/> | ||
== Waste Management == | == Waste Management == | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Weapons Proliferation == | == Weapons Proliferation == | ||
<ref name= | The chemistry of the IFR fuel process does not allow extraction of weapons-grade material at any point in the cycle. | ||
Spent fuel is a mix of uranium, plutonium, and various actinides. | |||
Processing would be necessary by some other unrelated process, a situation not different in kind from starting with unprocessed fuel. | |||
So the IFR adds little or nothing to proliferation risk.<ref name=ProlifRisk/> | |||
In countries not licensed for fuel processing, return of the spent fuel to a secure location could be handled as any other reactor with solid fuel rods. Rods are easy to count, and the number in transit at any one time can be small enough to avoid theft of a large quantity. | |||
== Cost == | == Cost == | ||
Line 29: | Line 34: | ||
<ref name=IFR>[http://www.thesciencecouncil.com/pdfs/PlentifulEnergy.pdf PLENTIFUL ENERGY] The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011. | <ref name=IFR>[http://www.thesciencecouncil.com/pdfs/PlentifulEnergy.pdf PLENTIFUL ENERGY] The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011. | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
<ref name=IFRfig6.1>Fig.6.1 in [http://www.thesciencecouncil.com/pdfs/PlentifulEnergy.pdf PLENTIFUL ENERGY] The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011. | <ref name=IFRfig6.1>''Schematic of the metal fuel rod.'' Fig.6.1 in [http://www.thesciencecouncil.com/pdfs/PlentifulEnergy.pdf PLENTIFUL ENERGY] The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011. | ||
</ref> | |||
<ref name=IFRtests>''Experimental Confirmations of Limited Damage in the Most Severe Accidents,'' Ch.7.10 in | |||
[http://www.thesciencecouncil.com/pdfs/PlentifulEnergy.pdf PLENTIFUL ENERGY] The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011. | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
<ref name= | <ref name=ProlifRisk>''Nonproliferation Aspects of the IFR,'' Ch.12 in [http://www.thesciencecouncil.com/pdfs/PlentifulEnergy.pdf PLENTIFUL ENERGY] The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011. | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 09:15, 16 April 2023
The Integral Fast Reactor is Argonne Lab's best design,[1] a metal-fueled, sodium-cooled, pool-type Fast Neutron Reactor, addressing all the issues raised in Nuclear_power_reconsidered (safety, waste management, weapons proliferation, and cost). "Integral" refers to the on-site reprocessing of the spent fuel.
Choice of Fuel and Coolant
The IFR has a unique design for its fuel rods, which allows larger burnup of the fuel, and provides inherent safety if the rod ever gets too hot. The fuel slug is loose in the cladding, and there is space above the fuel to contain gaseous fission products released as the fuel is consumed. See Figure 1. In standard fuel rods, the cladding must be tight around the ceramic fuel pellets to ensure adequate thermal conductivity and avoid overheating the fuel. This limits the lifetime of the rods, because the fuel swells and the cladding cracks as the gaseous fission products accumulate. The loose fit in the IFR rods is possible, because the gap is filled with highly conductive liquid sodium. Pure metallic fuel can be used, instead of oxides, because the sodium doesn't corrode the fuel or the steel cladding. If the metal fuel gets too hot, it melts and expands into the gas plenum, shutting down the fission reaction.
Safety
The safety of the IFR design is ensured by several features:
1) The metal fuel, a low melting point alloy of U-Pu-Zr, will melt if the rod ever gets too hot. The fuel then expands upward in the steel cladding, shutting down the fission reactions. See Fig.1.
2) Many of the fission products bind chemically with sodium, reducing the risk of fission product release if there is fuel failure.
3) The large pool of molten sodium will easily handle the decay heat after a shut-down. See Fig.2.
4) The reactor vessel has no penetrations below the top of the pool, eliminating the possibility of sodium leakage.
5) There is no high pressure or any water near the reactor vessel.
6) The entire reactor chamber can be flooded with Argon, eliminating the possibility of a sodium fire.
Tests were conducted at Idaho National Laboratory in which the primary coolant pump was stopped with the reactor running at full power. The reactor shut itself down with no damage.[3]
Waste Management
Fuel rods have an advantage over molten salt fuels in that the fission products are contained in the rod. This means a smaller volume of radioactive spent fuel. Also rods are easy to identify and count, which may be advantageous in preventing diversion. A typical 500 MWe MSR produces 13 tonnes of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) per year. A 500 MWe PWR produces ___ kg per year of SNF. A 500 MWe IFR produces ___ kg per year of (High Level Waste) HLW. Note: SNF can be reprocessed, and the final amount of HLW will depend on the details of that process.
Weapons Proliferation
The chemistry of the IFR fuel process does not allow extraction of weapons-grade material at any point in the cycle. Spent fuel is a mix of uranium, plutonium, and various actinides. Processing would be necessary by some other unrelated process, a situation not different in kind from starting with unprocessed fuel. So the IFR adds little or nothing to proliferation risk.[4] In countries not licensed for fuel processing, return of the spent fuel to a secure location could be handled as any other reactor with solid fuel rods. Rods are easy to count, and the number in transit at any one time can be small enough to avoid theft of a large quantity.
Cost
Notes and References
- ↑ PLENTIFUL ENERGY The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011.
- ↑ Schematic of the metal fuel rod. Fig.6.1 in PLENTIFUL ENERGY The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011.
- ↑ Experimental Confirmations of Limited Damage in the Most Severe Accidents, Ch.7.10 in PLENTIFUL ENERGY The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011.
- ↑ Nonproliferation Aspects of the IFR, Ch.12 in PLENTIFUL ENERGY The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, Charles Till and Yoon Il Chang, 2011.