Talk:Molten chloride fast reactor: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(add link to YouTube video - Physicist dismisses molten salt nuclear reactors as a "waste of time") |
m (remove {{subpages}} from talk page) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Physicist dismisses molten salt nuclear reactors as a "waste of time" = | = Physicist dismisses molten salt nuclear reactors as a "waste of time" = | ||
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCpVTO_BHto Energi Media video] 59,515 views Oct 11, 2021. | [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCpVTO_BHto Energi Media video] 59,515 views Oct 11, 2021. |
Revision as of 12:12, 5 November 2023
Physicist dismisses molten salt nuclear reactors as a "waste of time"
Energi Media video 59,515 views Oct 11, 2021.
- 03:15 Only two MSRs ever been built, and they are unreliable. The MSRE at Oak Ridge National Laboratory ran only 4 years, and had to shut down 225 times.
- 04:15 The reprocessing technology (pyroprocessing) can be easily used to make nuclear weapons from plutonium. The reprocessed plutonium is not pure enough for weapons, but that doesn't matter. The last 10% of the work can be done by anybody anywhere.
- 04:55 Pyroprocessing has been tried in the United States, and the track record is "abysmal". The "EBR reactor" was a failure.
- 06:05 It is unlikely that nuclear engineers will be able to overcome "these challenges". It will take "hundreds of millions of dollars" and many more years to prove a design will withstand earthquakes and fires.