High Value Detainee: Difference between revisions
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "[[" to "") |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "]]" to "") |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{TOC|right}} | {{TOC|right}} | ||
A '''High Value Detainee''' was a term used in George W. Bush Administration | A '''High Value Detainee''' was a term used in George W. Bush Administration policy documents to refer to persons believed to either to know critical information of terrorism|terrorist threats against the United States, and to constitute a continuing danger if released. After their capture, they were held in undisclosed confinement facilities operated by the Central Intelligence Agency, but, by 2007, transferred to Guantanamo Bay detention camp. | ||
These were the individuals for whom specific authorization was given to use enhanced interrogation techniques | These were the individuals for whom specific authorization was given to use enhanced interrogation techniques, which went beyond the methods generally accepted as within U.S. and international law as defined in military interrogation guidance. The methods, however, were used within an initial framework legal guidance that they did not constitute torture, although at least one method, waterboarding interrogation techniques|waterboarding, has subsequently been deemed torture by U.S. officials such as Susan Crawford, convening authority of Military Commissions. | ||
The original definition, provided by a Central Intelligence Agency | The original definition, provided by a Central Intelligence Agency assistant general counsel, whose name was redacted from the released document, <ref name=OLC2005-05-10-Doc13>{{citation | ||
| author = Steven Bradbury | | author = Steven Bradbury, Office of the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice | ||
| title = Memorandum for John A. Rizzo, Senior Deputy General Counsel, Central Intelligence Agency, '''Re:''' Application of 18 USC 2340-2340A to Certain Techniques That May Be Used in the Interrogation of a High Value Al-Qaeda Detainee | | title = Memorandum for John A. Rizzo, Senior Deputy General Counsel, Central Intelligence Agency, '''Re:''' Application of 18 USC 2340-2340A to Certain Techniques That May Be Used in the Interrogation of a High Value Al-Qaeda Detainee | ||
| date = May 10, 2005 | | date = May 10, 2005 | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
"A detainee who, at time of capture, we have reason to believe: | "A detainee who, at time of capture, we have reason to believe: | ||
#is a senior member of al-Qaeda | #is a senior member of al-Qaeda or an al-Qaeda associated terrorist group (Jemaah Islamiya, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, al-Zarqawi Group, etc.) | ||
#has knowledge of imminent terrorist threats against the USA, its military forces, its citizens and organizations, or its allies, or that has/had direct involvement in planning and preparing terrorist actions against the USA or its allies, or assisting the al-Qaeda | #has knowledge of imminent terrorist threats against the USA, its military forces, its citizens and organizations, or its allies, or that has/had direct involvement in planning and preparing terrorist actions against the USA or its allies, or assisting the al-Qaeda leadership in planning and preparing such terrorist actions; and | ||
#if released, constitutes a clear and continuing threat to the USA or its allies.: <ref>Fax for Daniel Levin, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, from [name redacted] Assistant General Counsel, CIA; January 4, 2005; quoted by Bradbury in May 10 memo</ref> | #if released, constitutes a clear and continuing threat to the USA or its allies.: <ref>Fax for Daniel Levin, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, from [name redacted] Assistant General Counsel, CIA; January 4, 2005; quoted by Bradbury in May 10 memo</ref> | ||
==Identified detainees== | ==Identified detainees== | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
! Date of Arrest | ! Date of Arrest | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Abu Zubaydah | | Abu Zubaydah | ||
| Palestinian | | Palestinian | ||
| Faisalabad, Pakistan | | Faisalabad, Pakistan | ||
| 28 March 2002 | | 28 March 2002 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Ramzi Binalshibh | | Ramzi Binalshibh | ||
|Yemeni | |Yemeni | ||
| Karachi, Pakistan | | Karachi, Pakistan | ||
| 11 September 2002 | | 11 September 2002 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri | | Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri | ||
| Saudi | | Saudi | ||
| Dubai | | Dubai | ||
| October 2002 | | October 2002 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi | | Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi | ||
| Saudi | | Saudi | ||
| Rawalpindi, Pakistan | | Rawalpindi, Pakistan | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| 1 March 2003 | | 1 March 2003 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Majid Khan | | Majid Khan | ||
| Pakistani | | Pakistani | ||
| Karachi, Pakistan | | Karachi, Pakistan | ||
| 5 March 2003 | | 5 March 2003 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Ammar al-Baluchi | | Ammar al-Baluchi | ||
| Pakistani | | Pakistani | ||
| Karachi, Pakistan | | Karachi, Pakistan | ||
| 29 April 2003 | | 29 April 2003 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Khallad | | Khallad | ||
| Yemeni | | Yemeni | ||
| Karachi, Pakistan | | Karachi, Pakistan | ||
| 29 April 2003 | | 29 April 2003 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Zubair | | Zubair | ||
| Malaysian | | Malaysian | ||
| Bangkok, Thailand | | Bangkok, Thailand | ||
| 8 June 2003 | | 8 June 2003 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Lillie | | Lillie | ||
| Malaysian | | Malaysian | ||
| Bangkok, Thailand | | Bangkok, Thailand | ||
| 11 August 2003 | | 11 August 2003 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Hambali | | Hambali | ||
| Indonesian | | Indonesian | ||
| Ayutthaya, Thailand | | Ayutthaya, Thailand | ||
| 11 August 2003 | | 11 August 2003 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Gouled Hassan Dourad | | Gouled Hassan Dourad | ||
| Somali | | Somali | ||
| Djibouti | | Djibouti | ||
| 4 March 2004 | | 4 March 2004 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Haytham al-Kini | | Haytham al-Kini | ||
| Tanzanian | | Tanzanian | ||
| Gujarat, Pakistan | | Gujarat, Pakistan | ||
| 25 July 2004 | | 25 July 2004 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Abu Faraj | | Abu Faraj | ||
| Libyan | | Libyan | ||
| Mardan, Pakistan | | Mardan, Pakistan | ||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
==International Red Cross review== | ==International Red Cross review== | ||
While press access was denied, the International Committee of the Red Cross | While press access was denied, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) did visit the High Value Detainees, at Guantanamo Bay detention camp, in October 2006, speaking to them privately. ICRC reports are usually kept confidential between the ICRC and the government involved, but this report was leaked. It was sent to John Rizzo, acting general counsel of the CIA, by Geoff Loane, head of the regional delegation, in February 2007.<ref name=ICRC /> | ||
The ICRC made the assumption that international humanitarian law applied to the detainees, a point disputed by the Administration. Within that context, they had made requests to visit detainees since 2002, which had been refused. They were given access to the HVD after President Bush made a public announcement of their presence at Guantanamo. | The ICRC made the assumption that international humanitarian law applied to the detainees, a point disputed by the Administration. Within that context, they had made requests to visit detainees since 2002, which had been refused. They were given access to the HVD after President Bush made a public announcement of their presence at Guantanamo. | ||
The report formally concluded that "the allegations of the fourteen include descriptions of treatment and interrogation techniques — singly or in combination — that amounted to torture and/or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment." The United States position is that "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment" would have to violate relevant U.S. law cited at the time of the ratification of the Convention against Torture | The report formally concluded that "the allegations of the fourteen include descriptions of treatment and interrogation techniques — singly or in combination — that amounted to torture and/or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment." The United States position is that "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment" would have to violate relevant U.S. law cited at the time of the ratification of the Convention against Torture. | ||
==Results of interrogations== | ==Results of interrogations== | ||
Michael Hayden | Michael Hayden, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, and Michael Mukasey, former Attorney General, said "fully half of the government's knowledge about the structure and activities of al-Qaeda came from those interrogations...Details of these successes, and the methods used to obtain them, were disclosed repeatedly in more than 30 congressional briefings and hearings beginning in 2002, and open to all members of the Intelligence Committees of both Houses of Congress beginning in September 2006. Any protestation of ignorance of those details, particularly by members of those committees, is pretense."<ref name=WSJ2009-04-17>{{citation | ||
| date = April 17, 2009 | | date = April 17, 2009 | ||
| title = The President Ties His Own Hands on Terror: The point of interrogation is intelligence, not confession | | title = The President Ties His Own Hands on Terror: The point of interrogation is intelligence, not confession | ||
| url = http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123993446103128041.html | | url = http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123993446103128041.html | ||
| journal = Wall Street Journal | | journal = Wall Street Journal | ||
| author = Michael Hayden | | author = Michael Hayden and Michael Mukasey}}</ref> In particular, the interrogations of the first HVD, Abu Zubaydah, provided key information that led to capture of many of the others. <ref name=OLC2002-08-01>{{citation | ||
| url = http://luxmedia.vo.llnwd.net/o10/clients/aclu/olc_08012002_bybee.pdf | | url = http://luxmedia.vo.llnwd.net/o10/clients/aclu/olc_08012002_bybee.pdf | ||
| author = Jay Bybee | | author = Jay Bybee, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice | ||
| title = Memorandum for John Rizzo, Acting General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency: Interrogation of Al-Qaeda Operative | | title = Memorandum for John Rizzo, Acting General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency: Interrogation of Al-Qaeda Operative | ||
| date = August 1, 2002. | | date = August 1, 2002. | ||
Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
*Khalid Sheikh Mohammed | *Khalid Sheikh Mohammed | ||
*Khallad | *Khallad (aka) Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarek Bin 'Attash | ||
*Ramzi Binalshibh | *Ramzi Binalshibh | ||
*Ammar al-Baluchi | *Ammar al-Baluchi (aka) Ali Abdul Aziz Ali | ||
*Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi | *Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi (aka) Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} |
Revision as of 06:30, 18 March 2024
This article may be deleted soon. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A High Value Detainee was a term used in George W. Bush Administration policy documents to refer to persons believed to either to know critical information of terrorism|terrorist threats against the United States, and to constitute a continuing danger if released. After their capture, they were held in undisclosed confinement facilities operated by the Central Intelligence Agency, but, by 2007, transferred to Guantanamo Bay detention camp. These were the individuals for whom specific authorization was given to use enhanced interrogation techniques, which went beyond the methods generally accepted as within U.S. and international law as defined in military interrogation guidance. The methods, however, were used within an initial framework legal guidance that they did not constitute torture, although at least one method, waterboarding interrogation techniques|waterboarding, has subsequently been deemed torture by U.S. officials such as Susan Crawford, convening authority of Military Commissions. The original definition, provided by a Central Intelligence Agency assistant general counsel, whose name was redacted from the released document, [1] was: "A detainee who, at time of capture, we have reason to believe:
Identified detaineesPersons in this category, listed by the apparently most common name in biographical information,[3] and with dates from the ICRC report,[4] include: [5]
International Red Cross reviewWhile press access was denied, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) did visit the High Value Detainees, at Guantanamo Bay detention camp, in October 2006, speaking to them privately. ICRC reports are usually kept confidential between the ICRC and the government involved, but this report was leaked. It was sent to John Rizzo, acting general counsel of the CIA, by Geoff Loane, head of the regional delegation, in February 2007.[4] The ICRC made the assumption that international humanitarian law applied to the detainees, a point disputed by the Administration. Within that context, they had made requests to visit detainees since 2002, which had been refused. They were given access to the HVD after President Bush made a public announcement of their presence at Guantanamo. The report formally concluded that "the allegations of the fourteen include descriptions of treatment and interrogation techniques — singly or in combination — that amounted to torture and/or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment." The United States position is that "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment" would have to violate relevant U.S. law cited at the time of the ratification of the Convention against Torture. Results of interrogationsMichael Hayden, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, and Michael Mukasey, former Attorney General, said "fully half of the government's knowledge about the structure and activities of al-Qaeda came from those interrogations...Details of these successes, and the methods used to obtain them, were disclosed repeatedly in more than 30 congressional briefings and hearings beginning in 2002, and open to all members of the Intelligence Committees of both Houses of Congress beginning in September 2006. Any protestation of ignorance of those details, particularly by members of those committees, is pretense."[6] In particular, the interrogations of the first HVD, Abu Zubaydah, provided key information that led to capture of many of the others. [7] On May 9, 2008, a U.S. Military Commission announced it planned to try five defendants for 9/11 related charges. [8]
References
|