F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Difference between revisions
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "[[" to "") |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "]]" to "") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | {{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | ||
The '''F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)''' is the name for a family of fighter aircraft#multirole fighters|multirole fighters | The '''F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)''' is the name for a family of fighter aircraft#multirole fighters|multirole fighters being built in three versions: | ||
*F-35A Lightning II | *F-35A Lightning II: Conventional takeoff and landing, not carrier-capable, specifically for United States Air Force requirements. Will replace A-10 Warthog and F-16 Fighting Falcon; complements F-22 Raptor. In addition to the U.S., to be used by Australia, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands (may be reconsidered), Norway and Turkey; possibly Israeli Defense Forces|Israel. "International partner versions" may lack some capabilities of the U.S. production models. | ||
*F-35B Lightning II | *F-35B Lightning II: Short takeoff and vertical landing, meeting the environmental requirements of shipboard use, but not catapulted. To be used by the Italian Navy, U.K. Royal Air Force and Royal Navy, United States Marine Corps; will replace assorted versions of the Harrier aircraft. | ||
*F-35C Lightning II | *F-35C Lightning II: Conventional takeoff and landing, carrier-capable and catapult-launched, for United States Navy requirements. Will replace F-18 Hornet but not necessarily F-18 Super Hornet | ||
JSF, in U.S. doctrine, is the "low" end of the fighter mix, the "high" end being the F-22 Raptor | JSF, in U.S. doctrine, is the "low" end of the fighter mix, the "high" end being the F-22 Raptor. Both the F-22 and F-35 are considered fighter aircraft#fifth generation|fifth generation jet fighters. | ||
==Engines== | ==Engines== | ||
Part of the JSF competitive propulsion system program, within the JSF program, had been for General Electric | Part of the JSF competitive propulsion system program, within the JSF program, had been for General Electric/Rolls Royce to develop an F136 engine, which is intended to provide JSF users a competitive choice between the existing United Technologies' Pratt & Whitney division's F135 engine and the F136 engine. Congress has supported this initiative since 1995, but the Department of Defense has not included funding for the competitive propulsion system program in its budget requests since 2006. Since then, Congress has provided annual increases to the budget request to continue this program. Over the long-term, the House Armed Services Committee expects that engine competition will not only reduce engine procurement costs, but will also provide better engine performance, improved contractor responsiveness, a more robust industrial base, increased engine reliability, and improved operational readiness. | ||
Nevertheles, the second engine development has been attacked as unneeded "pork", and the Obama Administration | Nevertheles, the second engine development has been attacked as unneeded "pork", and the Obama Administration cancelled the project. <ref>{{citation | ||
| title = GE/Rolls To Fight Termination Of F136 Engine | | title = GE/Rolls To Fight Termination Of F136 Engine | ||
| journal = Aviation Week and Space Technology | | journal = Aviation Week and Space Technology | ||
| url = http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/asd/2011/04/26/01.xml | | url = http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/asd/2011/04/26/01.xml | ||
| date = 26 April 2011 | | date = 26 April 2011 | ||
| author = Guy Norris and Graham Warwick | | author = Guy Norris and Graham Warwick}}</ref> | ||
==Avionics== | ==Avionics== | ||
Advanced programmable avionics are among the features that make the F-35 fifth-generation. They interconnect in a modular, upgradable manner. Much of the avionics will be common, with the most extensive fit in the Air Force model. Interconnection of avionics is not limited to MIL-STD- | Advanced programmable avionics are among the features that make the F-35 fifth-generation. They interconnect in a modular, upgradable manner. Much of the avionics will be common, with the most extensive fit in the Air Force model. Interconnection of avionics is not limited to MIL-STD-1553B, but also includes IEEE 1394 Firewire and Fibre Channel. There are triple-redundant computers and Firewire buses in the Vehicle Management Computers of the Vehicle Management System for flight control, which act as the master for each bus. The bus cables are cross-connected so a cable failure can be circumvented. | ||
While 1553 handles some legacy functions, most processing is over 1394b <ref name=AA2007-09-05>{{citation | While 1553 handles some legacy functions, most processing is over 1394b <ref name=AA2007-09-05>{{citation | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
As with the F-22, much of the system is built around an AESA radar. A difference, however, is that the electro-optical tracking system (EOTS) is mounted in parallel with it. | As with the F-22, much of the system is built around an AESA radar. A difference, however, is that the electro-optical tracking system (EOTS) is mounted in parallel with it. | ||
===Computing and networking=== | ===Computing and networking=== | ||
The two interface modules, one per rack, link the CNI processors with the F-35 integrated core processor. Where signals leave the aircraft, they are encrypted. The aircraft uses a hybrid of MIL-STD-1553 | The two interface modules, one per rack, link the CNI processors with the F-35 integrated core processor. Where signals leave the aircraft, they are encrypted. The aircraft uses a hybrid of MIL-STD-1553 bus for controlling existing weapons and systems, but COTS high-speed interfaces for such things as video over Fibre Channel. | ||
Many of the components are reprogrammable before or during flight. Software defined radio | Many of the components are reprogrammable before or during flight. Software defined radio, for example, is the standard. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| identification-friend-or-foe | | identification-friend-or-foe | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
*Flight Control Systems: rudders, flaperons, horizontal tails, ailerons, air data probes, inertial electronics, and crash-survivable memory units | *Flight Control Systems: rudders, flaperons, horizontal tails, ailerons, air data probes, inertial electronics, and crash-survivable memory units | ||
*Utilities and Subsystems such as weapons bay door drives, power system controllers, brake controllers, and thermal management system controllers; | *Utilities and Subsystems such as weapons bay door drives, power system controllers, brake controllers, and thermal management system controllers; | ||
*Propulsion Systems such as Full Authority Digital Electronic Control | *Propulsion Systems such as Full Authority Digital Electronic Control (FADEC) over the main engine | ||
*Mission Systems including display management, lighting controller, communications/navigation/identification, and GPS; | *Mission Systems including display management, lighting controller, communications/navigation/identification, and GPS; | ||
*Flight data acquisition and recording | *Flight data acquisition and recording | ||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
===Sensors=== | ===Sensors=== | ||
There are five basic sensor systems: | There are five basic sensor systems: | ||
*The radar#active electronic scanned array|AESA phased-array radar | *The radar#active electronic scanned array|AESA phased-array radar, | ||
*The electro-optical targeting system | *The electro-optical targeting system (EOTS) with forward-looking infrared (FLIR) and infrared search and track (IRST) system, | ||
*The electronic warfare | *The electronic warfare suite, developed by BAE Systems, | ||
*The electro-optical distributed aperture system (DAS), and | *The electro-optical distributed aperture system (DAS), and | ||
*The communication, navigation and identification (CNI) suite, providing identification friend or foe (IFF) and offboard data delivered via a high-speed data link. | *The communication, navigation and identification (CNI) suite, providing identification friend or foe (IFF) and offboard data delivered via a high-speed data link. | ||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
Perhaps the most guarded capability on the F-35 is its automatic target recognition. Lockheed Martin would only say that the aircraft will be continuously processing sensor detections regardless of the orientation (air or ground track). "Some tracks can be easily and rapidly resolved and categorized, while others will require some extensive processing to resolve ambiguities," says a Lockheed official. For automatic target identification, he adds, the F-35 aircrew "will be able to choose target types during the preflight mission planning process." | Perhaps the most guarded capability on the F-35 is its automatic target recognition. Lockheed Martin would only say that the aircraft will be continuously processing sensor detections regardless of the orientation (air or ground track). "Some tracks can be easily and rapidly resolved and categorized, while others will require some extensive processing to resolve ambiguities," says a Lockheed official. For automatic target identification, he adds, the F-35 aircrew "will be able to choose target types during the preflight mission planning process." | ||
====Radar==== | ====Radar==== | ||
As does the F-22, the F-35 will have a radar#active electronic scanned array|AESA phased-array radar | As does the F-22, the F-35 will have a radar#active electronic scanned array|AESA phased-array radar, but a different one, the Northrop Grumman APG-81|AN/APG-81 from the F-22's APG-77|AN/APG-77. The two systems have significant commonality, but the F-35 probably has more ground targeting capability. The F-22 has more air combat and electronic warfare ability in its radar. | ||
It is likely the two systems will converge, as the APG-63|AN/APG-63 V(4) | It is likely the two systems will converge, as the APG-63|AN/APG-63 V(4) will eventually serve both the F-15 Eagle and F-15E Strike Eagle. | ||
====EOTS==== | ====EOTS==== | ||
When physically looking at the F-35's avionics, the EOTS, at first, might seem to be missing. After all, other aircraft either put it into a pod attached to a pylon, or has a turret. | When physically looking at the F-35's avionics, the EOTS, at first, might seem to be missing. After all, other aircraft either put it into a pod attached to a pylon, or has a turret. | ||
On closer examination, the EOTS is there, operating through a sapphire window in the F-35 nose, just below the AESA radar antenna. Coaxial EOTS and radar help MASINT#cueing|cross-cueing | On closer examination, the EOTS is there, operating through a sapphire window in the F-35 nose, just below the AESA radar antenna. Coaxial EOTS and radar help MASINT#cueing|cross-cueing between EOTS and radar, as opposed to the situation where the EOTS is shifted to a wing-mounted pod. | ||
====EW==== | ====EW==== | ||
====DA==== | ====DA==== | ||
One unique feature of the F-35 is the distributed aperture system | One unique feature of the F-35 is the distributed aperture system, a set of six infrared light|infrared cameras on the top, side, rear, etc., of the aircraft, so the pilot will have no blind spots; every possible view can be displayed on the "glass cockpit' screen. | ||
===CNI=== | ===CNI=== |
Revision as of 16:21, 30 March 2024
This article may be deleted soon. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is the name for a family of fighter aircraft#multirole fighters|multirole fighters being built in three versions:
JSF, in U.S. doctrine, is the "low" end of the fighter mix, the "high" end being the F-22 Raptor. Both the F-22 and F-35 are considered fighter aircraft#fifth generation|fifth generation jet fighters. EnginesPart of the JSF competitive propulsion system program, within the JSF program, had been for General Electric/Rolls Royce to develop an F136 engine, which is intended to provide JSF users a competitive choice between the existing United Technologies' Pratt & Whitney division's F135 engine and the F136 engine. Congress has supported this initiative since 1995, but the Department of Defense has not included funding for the competitive propulsion system program in its budget requests since 2006. Since then, Congress has provided annual increases to the budget request to continue this program. Over the long-term, the House Armed Services Committee expects that engine competition will not only reduce engine procurement costs, but will also provide better engine performance, improved contractor responsiveness, a more robust industrial base, increased engine reliability, and improved operational readiness. Nevertheles, the second engine development has been attacked as unneeded "pork", and the Obama Administration cancelled the project. [1] AvionicsAdvanced programmable avionics are among the features that make the F-35 fifth-generation. They interconnect in a modular, upgradable manner. Much of the avionics will be common, with the most extensive fit in the Air Force model. Interconnection of avionics is not limited to MIL-STD-1553B, but also includes IEEE 1394 Firewire and Fibre Channel. There are triple-redundant computers and Firewire buses in the Vehicle Management Computers of the Vehicle Management System for flight control, which act as the master for each bus. The bus cables are cross-connected so a cable failure can be circumvented. While 1553 handles some legacy functions, most processing is over 1394b [2] Given the importance of software, if the U.S. desires export control, it may be more a matter of what programming is included in a model, rather than what hardware devices are included[3] As with the F-22, much of the system is built around an AESA radar. A difference, however, is that the electro-optical tracking system (EOTS) is mounted in parallel with it. Computing and networkingThe two interface modules, one per rack, link the CNI processors with the F-35 integrated core processor. Where signals leave the aircraft, they are encrypted. The aircraft uses a hybrid of MIL-STD-1553 bus for controlling existing weapons and systems, but COTS high-speed interfaces for such things as video over Fibre Channel. Many of the components are reprogrammable before or during flight. Software defined radio, for example, is the standard.
Flight controlsComponents residing on the 1394b network serve the following systems, from a combination of computing and input/output devices supporting 10 remote units: Vehicle Systems Processing, VMC and RIO (10 remote input/output units);
SensorsThere are five basic sensor systems:
Perhaps the most guarded capability on the F-35 is its automatic target recognition. Lockheed Martin would only say that the aircraft will be continuously processing sensor detections regardless of the orientation (air or ground track). "Some tracks can be easily and rapidly resolved and categorized, while others will require some extensive processing to resolve ambiguities," says a Lockheed official. For automatic target identification, he adds, the F-35 aircrew "will be able to choose target types during the preflight mission planning process." RadarAs does the F-22, the F-35 will have a radar#active electronic scanned array|AESA phased-array radar, but a different one, the Northrop Grumman APG-81|AN/APG-81 from the F-22's APG-77|AN/APG-77. The two systems have significant commonality, but the F-35 probably has more ground targeting capability. The F-22 has more air combat and electronic warfare ability in its radar. It is likely the two systems will converge, as the APG-63|AN/APG-63 V(4) will eventually serve both the F-15 Eagle and F-15E Strike Eagle. EOTSWhen physically looking at the F-35's avionics, the EOTS, at first, might seem to be missing. After all, other aircraft either put it into a pod attached to a pylon, or has a turret. On closer examination, the EOTS is there, operating through a sapphire window in the F-35 nose, just below the AESA radar antenna. Coaxial EOTS and radar help MASINT#cueing|cross-cueing between EOTS and radar, as opposed to the situation where the EOTS is shifted to a wing-mounted pod. EWDAOne unique feature of the F-35 is the distributed aperture system, a set of six infrared light|infrared cameras on the top, side, rear, etc., of the aircraft, so the pilot will have no blind spots; every possible view can be displayed on the "glass cockpit' screen. CNIReferences
|