Talk:Cost of nuclear power: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Nuclear is too expensive: shorten link) |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) (please do not use present tense for values that may vary over time, suggest to get rid of the word ""currently" in this article) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Nuclear is too expensive== | ==Nuclear is too expensive== | ||
This discussion has been moved to the [[Cost of nuclear power/Debate Guide|Debate Guide]] page. | This discussion has been moved to the [[Cost of nuclear power/Debate Guide|Debate Guide]] page. | ||
==Use of the word "currently", and similar words,, is no good == | |||
Articles should not reference present tense in citing things like costs in the marketplace. Instead, please use month and year, with phrasing such as: "In June 2024, uranium was trading at $110." [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 05:04, 6 June 2024 (CDT) |
Revision as of 04:04, 6 June 2024
Nuclear is too expensive
This discussion has been moved to the Debate Guide page.
Use of the word "currently", and similar words,, is no good
Articles should not reference present tense in citing things like costs in the marketplace. Instead, please use month and year, with phrasing such as: "In June 2024, uranium was trading at $110." Pat Palmer (talk) 05:04, 6 June 2024 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Business Developing Articles
- Business Nonstub Articles
- Business Internal Articles
- Physics Developing Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Engineering Developing Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles