Talk:Joel Fuhrman: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(This is a good thing)
(thanks for the encouragement)
Line 2: Line 2:
== This is a good person to have an entry on==
== This is a good person to have an entry on==
I'm glad we have an article on Dr. Fuhrman. He is a well-respected, accomplished, and influential nutritional expert and physician. [[User:Jack S. Byrom|Jack S. Byrom]] ([[User talk:Jack S. Byrom|talk]]) 20:42, 26 March 2025 (CDT)
I'm glad we have an article on Dr. Fuhrman. He is a well-respected, accomplished, and influential nutritional expert and physician. [[User:Jack S. Byrom|Jack S. Byrom]] ([[User talk:Jack S. Byrom|talk]]) 20:42, 26 March 2025 (CDT)
:Thanks for the encouragement.  The last I check, the WP version of his article is somewhat critical of his work, which I find appalling.  Dr. Fuhrman seems totally legitimate to me.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 10:20, 29 March 2025 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:20, 29 March 2025

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Food Science, Health Sciences and Topic Informant [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English
To do.


Metadata here


This is a good person to have an entry on

I'm glad we have an article on Dr. Fuhrman. He is a well-respected, accomplished, and influential nutritional expert and physician. Jack S. Byrom (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2025 (CDT)

Thanks for the encouragement. The last I check, the WP version of his article is somewhat critical of his work, which I find appalling. Dr. Fuhrman seems totally legitimate to me.Pat Palmer (talk) 10:20, 29 March 2025 (CDT)