Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach
Workgroup category or categories | Music Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | External article: from another source, with little change |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 22:00, 3 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Bach has a synonym for "musician"
What is exactly Hull's argument for this claim? I am not entirely sure that this is accepted knowledge amongst Bach scholars, but I am happy to revise my opinion. Could anyone please shed light on this? Thanks! Matthias Röder 09:48, 8 August 2007 (CDT)
- I have read this claim many times, but I don't know the evidence for it. My vague recollection is that it applied only to the local community where the Bach family had dominated as musicians for centuries. Thus, it reflected local/regional linguistic practice, such as might have occurred with other trades where one family had dominated for centuries... I suppose the place to look would be regional German social history sources.--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 11:01, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
- We shall investigate this further. :-) Tanks for your comment, Martin! Matthias Röder 11:11, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
Bach copying scores by Johann Christoph Bach
The article states: "Bach's obituary indicates that he copied music out of Johann Christoph's scores, but his brother had apparently forbidden him to do so, possibly because scores were valuable and private commodities at the time."
It is more likely that Johann Christoph did not allow JS to copy from his scores because the pieces in them were important tools for carrying out his profession. Having access to particular pieces was a big advantage for a composer and organist in those days. And Johann Christoph may not have wanted JS to compromise this advantage.
Maybe we could look into this some more. I am sure Christoph Wolff has a statement about JS's copying activity in Ohrdruf in his biography of Bach. I don't have my copy with me at the moment. Could someone please check this? Thanks! Matthias Röder 09:57, 8 August 2007 (CDT)
References 3, 4, and 5
These references are unacceptable. There are much better sources for these statements in the original sources or serious Bach research. I am putting this remark here as a reminder for everyone who's working on this article, including myself. Once I have access to a decent musicological library again I will add these references. Cheers, Matthias Röder 10:08, 8 August 2007 (CDT)
- Maththias: please change and correct anything which you find appropriate. YOu could mention the changes in these pages, for clarity. THe article seems to have been imported from Wikipedia, so there is no problem in massive rewriting, if you think it desirable. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 11:04, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
- Music Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Music Advanced Articles
- Music Nonstub Articles
- Music Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Music Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Music Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Music Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Music External Articles
- Music Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Music Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup