Talk:Gross Domestic Product/Draft

From Citizendium
< Talk:Gross Domestic Product
Revision as of 05:15, 8 December 2007 by imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is a total of the outputs recorded in a country’s national income accounts. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Economics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive 1  English language variant British English

What is going on with this section?

underestimate the value of technological improvements such as increases in computing power. It is thus an incomplete guide to a country’s prosperity - and it is even less useful as a guide to well-being because of its exclusion of such matters as the levels of health, education, and security. The study of the meaning and justification of beliefs about the most general, or universal, aspects of things.
What's that last sentence doing in there? Epistemology?
It also seems like this argument is both completely valid and might be better located in an article on inflation.

Also, I'm working on a graph with GDP figures for a few big countries. Stephen Saletta 23:55, 6 December 2007 (CST)


I plan to return to complete this article when I have dealt with the index number question. I will remove the sentence you have quoted: since you thought it was about inflation, you have misunderstood it - and others will. That philosophy bit got there by accident.

If your graph brings out the danger of making GDP comparisons at nominal exchange rates, it will help to support the text. Otherwise, I'm not sure what purpose it would serve. Nick Gardner 00:58, 7 December 2007 (CST)


Since nothing seems to have been added since May, I have taken the liberty of expanding somewhat on the definition then provided. What now remains might perhaps serve either as a stub, or as the opening of a full article? Nick Gardner 10:40, 4 December 2007 (CST)

Maybe a section on the history of the GDP, links to GDP figures from large countries? Difference between GDP and GNP? Stephen Saletta 12:19, 4 December 2007 (CST)
Thank you for your interest, Stephen. I have done as you suggest, and spelled out the detail on GNP and NI (I had left them out for fear of reaching readers' boredom thresholds, but you are right, someone was bound to ask). I had it in mind to say something about PPP and the other problems of making international comparisons - with, as you suggest, some examples. Also something about the BEA's use of hedonic price indexes and something very brief about HDI, GPI and the rest. And I think there should be a paragraph about estimating errors and uncertainties. And links to material about the compiling of GDP estimates that is available at the BEA and other websites. Can you (or anyone) think of anything else that should be included? Nick Gardner 03:00, 5 December 2007 (CST)


Can someone do something with the mess on GDP deflator and either link to it or perhaps include the content here? --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 02:53, 5 December 2007 (CST)

How about a new article titled "Price Index" that would include the GDP deflator (revised) and the various consumer-, producer- and commodity-price indexes, and that would explain the base- and chain-linking options? Nick Gardner 04:00, 5 December 2007 (CST)

Yes, sounds good. WE have to make sure that all of these are interlinked. Maybe, I am not sure, but maybe the price index article could be a subpage of the GDP article. I think there should be a separate article on HDI, because it is rather more than GDP ! Martin Baldwin-Edwards
I have added in the opening para something on per capita and a link to HDI. Martin Baldwin-Edwards 15:34, 7 December 2007 (CST)


Article title

I've just noticed that the article title should be all in caps, as this is abbreviated to GDP. I will move it later, when nobody seems to be working on it. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 05:15, 8 December 2007 (CST)